ETC / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
ETC at $6.957 stays trapped below its 20-, 50-, and 200-day averages
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-22 09:07 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-28 — Neutral — -3.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — -5.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Overweight — -6.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -8.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -7.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -2.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — +3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -2.8% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained move above $7.031 with MACD histogram expanding would invalidate the bearish swing ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $6.42 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that $6.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that $6. Key support to defend sits near $6.42. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: ETC sits 20.2% under its SMA200, and the 30-day return is down 3.0%. But RSI at 45.3 isn’t capitulation, MACD is still positive at +0.01556, and price is only 8.4% above the $6.416 60-day low—plenty of washed-out territory for a snapback.
Leo, that $6.416 proximity is exactly the trap: price is leaning on support because the trend is weak, not because sellers are exhausted. ETC remains below every major average, with the SMA50 18.5% under the SMA200 and the MACD histogram contracting; your “positive” MACD is losing thrust.
· Oversold rebound from $6.416
· Sudden crypto-wide risk-on liquidity
· Short-covering above $7.031
Invalidation: A sustained move above $7.031 with MACD histogram expanding would invalidate the bearish swing ruling.
Mara, you’re treating a contracting +0.01556 histogram as a breakdown before it happens. At $6.957, a reclaim of $7.031 would put the immediate sellers on the back foot.
Leo, $7.031 is merely today’s high, not a trend reversal. Until ETC clears the SMA20 and then repairs the 20.2% SMA200 deficit, that rebound thesis is hopium with a level attached.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating a contracting +0.01556 histogram as a breakdown before it happens. At $6.957, a reclaim of $7.031 would put the immediate sellers on the back foot.
Leo, $7.031 is merely today’s high, not a trend reversal. Until ETC clears the SMA20 and then repairs the 20.2% SMA200 deficit, that rebound thesis is hopium with a level attached.
I’m with Mara on the positioning tell: 54.5% of accounts are long and the L/S ratio is 1.20, yet taker buy/sell is only 1.02. Longs have the crowd, but not convincing market aggression.
And the tape is trading inside a risk-off regime: Bitcoin is under $66,000, while a stablecoin exploit erased 99% of Balance. ETC needs liquidity, not just a mildly non-bearish RSI.
I rule for the bears, and the decisive exhibit is ETC’s price sitting 20.2% below the SMA200 while the SMA50/SMA200 structure remains bearish at -18.5%. My ruling is overturned by a sustained reclaim above the SMA20, or specifically a break and hold above $7.031 followed by improving MACD momentum; a close below $6.416 confirms the downside instead.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: ETC trades at $6.957, below SMA20 by 0.9%, SMA50 by 2.1%, and SMA200 by 20.2%. RSI is 45.3, while the SMA50 sits 18.5% below the SMA200 and MACD histogram has contracted to +0.01556.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Fear & Greed is 33, and only 54.5% of long accounts hold longs despite a 1.20 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell at 1.02 shows barely positive aggression, so the crowd is nervous but still leaning long.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The ETC-specific headline says the coin declined 3.42% amid a risk-off mood, while broader headlines point to Bitcoin below $66,000 and a 99% stablecoin collapse after an exploit. The news backdrop is defensive, not a catalyst for ETC.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack provides no fresh ETC token-economics or adoption figures. The available evidence is therefore price- and market-regime-driven, with ETC still 24.0% below its 60-day high of $9.154.
31b48c42a77e024cecbf278e5318abd88ca905f2d722fe2aa50178a9e3b33048d60befb007b8b2c9bb2f3e860a595495bb4427a42c1d8f8851947ca5b9c4caf9Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24