AR / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
AR sits at $1.857, 14.0% below its 200-day average as bearish structure dominates
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-26 00:46 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A+
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-30 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-28 — Overweight — +22.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — +21.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -10.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -4.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Overweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +4.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — +2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -4.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -3.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -6.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -6.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -6.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained close above $1.93 would invalidate the bearish swing ruling by reclaiming the near-term moving-average zone.. Cautious read: a break below $1.74 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that is precisely the hopium trap: “only” 6.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that is precisely the hopium trap: “only” 6. Key support to defend sits near $1.74. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: AR is 14.0% under SMA200 and the 60-day high at $2.677 is a distant mountaintop. But RSI at 42.3 isn’t capitulation, the MACD histogram is contracting, and price is only 6.6% above the $1.74 low—much of the damage is stale and priced in. A fear reading of 26 gives a rebound setup if sellers fail to crack that floor.
Leo, that is precisely the hopium trap: “only” 6.6% above $1.74 means the floor is close enough to test, not safe enough to trust. Your contracting MACD is still negative at -0.007626, while AR remains below every tracked moving average and the SMA50 sits 9.6% below SMA200. A modestly less-bad oscillator does not reverse a broken trend.
· Fear-driven rebound from $1.74
· Unreported funding or leverage imbalance
· Sudden AR-specific adoption catalyst
Invalidation: A sustained close above $1.93 would invalidate the bearish swing ruling by reclaiming the near-term moving-average zone.
Mara, you’re treating distance from the low as a death sentence, but RSI 42.3 leaves room for buyers before true exhaustion. If $1.74 holds, the risk-reward improves sharply from $1.857.
Leo, support is a level, not a promise. Taker buy/sell at 0.90 says buyers aren’t proving your defense, and AR is still 3.5% below SMA20 after a 1.4% seven-day slide.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating distance from the low as a death sentence, but RSI 42.3 leaves room for buyers before true exhaustion. If $1.74 holds, the risk-reward improves sharply from $1.857.
Leo, support is a level, not a promise. Taker buy/sell at 0.90 says buyers aren’t proving your defense, and AR is still 3.5% below SMA20 after a 1.4% seven-day slide.
Leo, the fear case is real, but I don’t see the positioning squeeze you need: longs are 47.7%, the L/S ratio is 0.91, and funding is unavailable. There’s no verified leverage imbalance to force upside.
Mara has the cleaner macro read. With no AR-specific catalyst in the headlines and the coin 30.7% below $2.677, liquidity is not rewarding premature dip-buying.
I rule for Mara’s bears, and my decisive exhibit is AR’s 14.0% discount to SMA200 alongside the -9.6% SMA50/SMA200 structure. The bearish ruling is overturned only by a sustained close above $1.93, reclaiming the SMA20 zone implied by the current $1.857 price and -3.5% gap.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
AR trades at $1.857, below SMA20 by 3.5%, SMA50 by 4.9%, and SMA200 by 14.0%. RSI at 42.3 and a contracting MACD histogram of -0.007626 show weak momentum, while $1.74 is the nearest structural floor.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Fear&Greed is 26, and AR’s positioning is not crowded long: only 47.7% of accounts are long, with an L/S ratio of 0.91 and taker buy/sell at 0.90. That fear can fuel a bounce, but current flow still favors sellers rather than a squeeze.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline set is mostly prediction content, including calls for rallies toward $6 or $15, which is promotional rather than actionable evidence. Broader crypto headlines mention Sberbank’s planned trading infrastructure and North Korean crypto-laundering arrests, but neither provides a direct AR catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no fresh Arweave-specific adoption, revenue, supply, or network-usage figures. Without fundamental evidence to offset the chart, the verdict must lean on price structure and market behavior.
c7e14c5f0b0b9293265f36c0dd99ee50ed7fd95d899882c0eb1b71c139a180afabe367d9f6473120ab57274a47b2717a285a90e3afdaff7e89e6c5e549a3ca83Committed 2026-07-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24