XTZ / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
XTZ’s 6.77% daily surge meets a bearish -31.4% gap to the 200-day SMA
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-20 03:08 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -7.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -4.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -3.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -7.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -8.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Neutral — -12.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a sustained break above the 60-day high at 0.2699.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1907 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the reversal argument collapses against the level he’s celebrating: XTZ is still 0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the reversal argument collapses against the level he’s celebrating: XTZ is still 0. Key support to defend sits near $0.1907. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number: XTZ sits 31.4% below its 200-day SMA and the 50/200-day structure is decisively bearish. But price is sprinting above its 20-day SMA by 7.0%, MACD is expanding at +0.002846, and the coin has gained 9.1% in seven days; that’s a live reversal attempt, not stale wreckage.
Leo, the reversal argument collapses against the level he’s celebrating: XTZ is still 0.9% below SMA50 and 20.6% beneath the 60-day high of 0.2699. RSI at 58.5 is merely mid-range, while the 30-day return remains -6.1%; a green week inside a damaged trend is exactly how hopium gets manufactured.
· Short-term momentum acceleration
· Bitcoin-led crypto beta
· RSI 58.5 and expanding MACD
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a sustained break above the 60-day high at 0.2699.
Mara, the tape has already lifted from the 60-day low of 0.1907 to 0.2146, a 12.4% rebound. You’re treating the rear-view mirror as a forecast.
Leo, that 12.4% rebound still leaves price 20.6% under 0.2699, and SMA50 remains below SMA200 by 30.8%. A bounce has to clear the damaged structure before it earns the word reversal.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the tape has already lifted from the 60-day low of 0.1907 to 0.2146, a 12.4% rebound. You’re treating the rear-view mirror as a forecast.
Leo, that 12.4% rebound still leaves price 20.6% under 0.2699, and SMA50 remains below SMA200 by 30.8%. A bounce has to clear the damaged structure before it earns the word reversal.
I’m with Mara on crowding: 62.9% of long accounts and a 1.70 L/S ratio lean optimistic, but taker buy/sell at 1.03 shows only modest urgency. The crowd is leaning bullish without delivering overwhelming flow.
Bitcoin touching $70,000 helps the backdrop, but XTZ’s -31.4% distance from SMA200 says liquidity has not repaired this chart. A macro tailwind can lift the boat while leaving the weakest hull underwater.
I rule for the bearish side: XTZ’s -31.4% distance below the 200-day SMA is the decisive exhibit, outweighing the +9.1% seven-day burst. The ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above the 60-day high at 0.2699, or by a clear momentum failure signaled by RSI(14) falling below 50 while price loses 0.1907.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: momentum, moving-average structure, key levels. Conflicts: RSI(14) is 58.5, MACD histogram is expanding at +0.002846, and 7-day performance is +9.1%, but price remains 0.9% below SMA50 and 31.4% below SMA200. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Direction: bearish. Evidence families: greed gauge, account positioning, taker flow, social balance. Conflicts: Fear & Greed is 62 and long accounts lead at 62.9% with an L/S ratio of 1.70, while taker flow is only 1.03 and StockTwits is split 1 bullish/1 bearish among four messages. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Direction: neutral. The supplied XTZ headlines are mostly evergreen explainers, price forecasts, conversion content, and a Manchester United–Tezos partnership reference. The broader Bitcoin move to $70,000 may support crypto beta, but the pack provides no fresh XTZ-specific catalyst or quantified impact.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Direction: neutral. The pack provides no supply, staking, revenue, adoption, or valuation figures for Tezos. The Manchester United multi-year deal is a real ecosystem reference, but its financial contribution is not quantified here.
1fdfc441b45b0230ad048abbdb92e1fd769e8935088de2a11d4e6cb51eda82963c48fe76cfdb380303016b74f46003f8e487fa46e3f85434b095720b4f300a33Committed 2026-08-21T00:20:00+00:00 · 88 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23