CoinVerdict
中文 Scoreboard

PENGU / The Verdict

generated 2026-08-03 02:12 UTC
$0.01
-0.38% · 24h
price as of 2026-08-03 02:12 UTC
Price source
📜 Archived verdict of 2026-08-03 — latest verdict → PENGU
The Verdict
Underweight

PENGU’s bearish structure outweighs a 48.2 RSI rebound signal

⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-03 02:12 UTC

Technicalsignal strength Bearish C
Measures how strong the directional signal from price structure is. An analyst lists independent evidence families (trend, momentum, structure) from the data pack; code converts the count to a letter — 3+ families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicting evidence caps the grade at C; insufficient information gets no grade at all. The letter is signal strength — direction is shown separately. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Sentimentsignal strength Mixed C
Same scale as Technical, applied to crowd evidence — fear/greed, positioning, and flow. 3+ independent evidence families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicts cap at C; not enough information, no grade. The letter says how loud the crowd signal is, not which way price will go. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction Longs pay A
Measures perpetual funding-rate pressure — risk, not direction. The smaller the 8-hour normalized rate, the calmer the market: under 0.5 bp = A+, then A, B, C, D as pressure grows, F beyond 10 bp (extreme crowding). Who pays (longs or shorts) is shown separately. Read A+ as “calm”, never as “bullish”. (funding_rule_v1) full scales →
KOL Consensussettled-record quality Archive building
Measures the quality and strength of on-record KOL consensus. Only authors with 20+ settled calls count. The majority share sets the base letter (85%+ = A+ down to 55%+ = D), but few qualified authors cap it — under 5 authors we show the direction and withhold the grade while the record builds. (kol_rule_v1) full scales →

Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.

Track record
1W–0L–4P · since 2026-07-22
95% CI 20.7–100.0% · n=1 · early sample
2026-08-03 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-10
2026-08-02 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-09
2026-08-01 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-08
2026-07-31 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-07
2026-07-30 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-06
2026-07-29 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-05
2026-07-28 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-04
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-27 · PENGU price $0.006355 · BTC $65216
Settled (T+7d)
2026-08-03 · PENGU price $0.006078 · BTC $63435.7
vs BTC
-1.7% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-26 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-26 · PENGU price $0.006206 · BTC $64416
Settled (T+7d)
2026-08-02 · PENGU price $0.006034 · BTC $62914.5
vs BTC
-0.5% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-24 — Underweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-24 · PENGU price $0.006102 · BTC $64928
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-31 · PENGU price $0.006082 · BTC $64779.5
vs BTC
-0.1% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-23 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-23 · PENGU price $0.00632 · BTC $66209
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-30 · PENGU price $0.005865 · BTC $64044.7
vs BTC
-4.1% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-22 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-22 · PENGU price $0.006277 · BTC $65937.6
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-29 · PENGU price $0.005962 · BTC $64051
vs BTC
-2.2% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →

The evidence
Bear evidence ✓ aligns with this verdict
Market state

coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read

Price
Price at verdict$0.006078 -0.4% 24h
60d high0.007509 -19.2%
60d low0.005554 +9.3%
RSI(14)48.2
vs 200d SMA -18.4%
30d change -8.9%
Funding (net) +0.85 bp/8h
Fear & Greed28 · Fear
Long accounts51.7% long
StockTwits (self-tagged)11 bull / 1 bear · 14 msgs

snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges

Read this ruling three ways

Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.

The Deliberation
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
VS
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
!
THE RISKS — is the uncertainty laid out?
Aggressive desk
Conservative desk
Neutral desk

Invalidation: The bearish verdict is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.007509, the 60-day high.

⚔ Key clashes
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
TO
Positioning Desk (Theo Okafor)
DV
Macro Desk (Dmitri Volkov)
JA
Risk Committee · Final Ruling
Chief Adjudicator (Aldrich)
DirectionBearish
ConfidenceMedium
HorizonWeeks (swing)
Key support$0.005554
Key resistance$0.007509
InvalidationThe bearish verdict is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.007509, the 60-day high.
Main risksFear-driven short-term reboundKAST partnership adoption upsideMACD momentum broadening
KOL Settlement Seat
Calls on record: 0 up · 0 down

Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind

Analyst notes
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)

I see a damaged chart: price sits 18.4% below SMA200, while SMA50 trails SMA200 by 15.7%. The expanding MACD histogram and 7-day gain of 2.0% are only a countertrend spark beneath that overhead supply.

Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)

I read fear at 28, with long accounts only modestly dominant at 51.7% and a 1.07 L/S ratio. Taker buying at 1.16 and 11 bullish versus 1 bearish StockTwits posts show dip-buying appetite, but that optimism is fragile against the broader downtrend.

Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)

I see a split tape: KAST’s IP-backed stablecoin card partnership is constructive, while reports of heavy selling after the comic launch point to immediate supply pressure. Price-prediction headlines and a reported 4.18-point surge are promotional noise, not durable catalysts.

Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)

I find one tangible adoption angle in KAST’s Pudgy Penguins card partnership, but the pack provides no token-economics, revenue, supply, or valuation figures. The fundamental case therefore cannot offset a price 19.2% below its 60-day high.

Provenance
Report fingerprint
c9719aef4704c936153db9300080f8229bec095fdbf366fc750d61b30cc15bdb
UTC date
2026-08-03

Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain

SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.

Recent verdicts
Related verdicts