XLM / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
XLM’s 0.18425 price sits below SMA20 and SMA50 as 30-day losses reach 18.3%
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-17 00:19 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Neutral — -3.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Overweight — -7.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -10.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -10.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Overweight — -6.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -5.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -6.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -9.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -7.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -1.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -5.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -4.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Neutral — -6.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Neutral — -3.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Neutral — -3.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Neutral — -2.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — +2.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.2000 accompanied by RSI above 50.. Cautious read: a break below $0.18318 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost. Key support to defend sits near $0.18318. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance. I’ll concede the ugly number: XLM is down 18.3% over 30 days and sits 8.0% under SMA50. But price is still 2.0% above SMA200, SMA50 remains 10.9% higher than SMA200, and the MACD histogram is contracting—this may be a bruised spring, not a broken engine.
I’m Mara Frost. Leo’s SMA200 lifeline is the whole hopium trade, while the tape keeps voting against him: XLM is below both SMA20 and SMA50, down 3.3% in seven days, and only 45.6 on RSI. A contracting negative MACD histogram is not a reversal; it’s merely a smaller leak in a sinking boat.
· SMA200 support near current price
· Fear-driven contrarian rebound
· Positive institutional crypto-sector spillover
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.2000 accompanied by RSI above 50.
Mara, you’re treating 0.18425 as a verdict when the 0.1389 60-day low is still 32.7% below us. The market has already priced a lot of damage.
Leo, the relevant exhibit is the 0.2979 high sitting 38.1% above us, not a distant floor. Your supposed spring has already lost 18.3% in a month.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating 0.18425 as a verdict when the 0.1389 60-day low is still 32.7% below us. The market has already priced a lot of damage.
Leo, the relevant exhibit is the 0.2979 high sitting 38.1% above us, not a distant floor. Your supposed spring has already lost 18.3% in a month.
I’m Theo Okafor. Fear is real at 27, but longs still edge shorts at 52.0% with an L/S ratio of 1.08, while taker buy/sell is 0.93. That’s nervous positioning with active selling—not a clean contrarian washout.
I’m Dmitri Volkov. The institutional headlines describe crypto plumbing, not XLM demand. Without a direct liquidity impulse or XLM-specific catalyst, the market’s broad risk appetite gets the final vote—and the current tape is weak.
I’m Judge Aldrich, and I rule bearish for the next several weeks. The decisive exhibit is XLM trading 8.0% below SMA50 while posting a 30-day loss of 18.3%; the bullish SMA structure is not enough to override that momentum damage. I overturn this ruling only if price reclaims 0.2000 and RSI rises above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura. XLM trades 2.7% below SMA20 and 8.0% below SMA50, with RSI at 45.6 and MACD histogram negative at -0.0005283. The longer-term structure still has one bullish fault line: SMA50 is 10.9% above SMA200 and price is 2.0% above SMA200.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes. Fear&Greed is 27, while long accounts hold 52.0% and the L/S ratio is 1.08—fearful, but not capitulation. Taker buy/sell at 0.93 shows sellers still have the immediate edge; funding and KOL data are unavailable.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh. The headlines point to expanding institutional crypto infrastructure, including T. Rowe Price’s multi-token ETF and Visa’s Open USD platform. None names a direct XLM catalyst, so the news flow is sector-positive but coin-neutral.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand. The data pack provides no XLM-specific adoption, supply, revenue, or network-usage figures. Broad payment and institutional headlines may support the category, but they do not establish a fundamental repricing case for XLM.
b1bc9c4e710b4274b45c566e84c447321e8351694b2d1a2777c5f625ca05654070e6e12fe78524df5289beb80d3f4382c89c73b1c7a527091a8c313a2bcf59adCommitted 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25