VIRTUAL / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
VIRTUAL gains 7.1% in 24h with RSI at 65.7, pressing toward the $0.6826 60-day high
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-21 02:42 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bullish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bullish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Overweight — -5.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — +7.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -2.0% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +2.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -1.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -5.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -10.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A daily close below $0.6388, or a negative MACD histogram, overturns the bullish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.6388 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your 17.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bullish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I concede the ugliest number: SMA50 is 10. Resistance to clear sits near $0.6826. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugliest number: SMA50 is 10.8% below SMA200, a bearish skeleton under the rally. But price is now 13.8% above SMA20, MACD histogram is +0.0106 and expanding, and a 17.4% seven-day burst says the market is repairing that skeleton in real time. The recent underweight calls lost on August 6 (+5.9% versus BTC) and August 7 (+3.3%); this tape has momentum and a Bitcoin breakout behind it, so fading strength is stale.
Leo, your 17.4% is precisely the exhibit that breaks your case: a fast run leaves VIRTUAL only 4.1% below $0.6826 while Fear&Greed is already 72. RSI 65.7 is not exhaustion, but it is high enough that the remaining upside to the listed high is narrow relative to the crowded bullish tilt of 53.0% long accounts. The August 6 and August 7 underweight losses prove only that timing was wrong then, not that today’s euphoric structure is durable.
I’m more bullish than the ruling: VIRTUAL is only 4.1% below $0.6826, and a break of that 60-day high could expose how much upside the current 72 Fear&Greed reading still underprices. The +17.4% seven-day move and +0.0106 expanding MACD histogram show acceleration, not merely recovery.
The fastest failure is a rejection near $0.6826 after RSI 65.7 and Fear&Greed 72 have pulled optimism forward. The fragile exhibit is the 13.8% premium to SMA20: if that gap compresses, the bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread of -10.8% can reclaim the narrative quickly.
I think the conservative desk overreaches by treating 72 Fear&Greed as proof of exhaustion, but the aggressive desk overreaches by pricing a breakout before one exists. The deciding condition is whether VIRTUAL clears $0.6826 or instead breaks below $0.6388.
· rejection at $0.6826
· bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure
· greed at 72 with 53.0% long accounts
Invalidation: A daily close below $0.6388, or a negative MACD histogram, overturns the bullish ruling.
Mara, the $0.6826 ceiling is 4.1% away, but MACD is expanding and price is above every listed average by at least 0.5%; ceilings get tested when momentum has this much torque.
Leo, “above SMA200” by just 0.5% is a thin victory lap, while SMA50 remains 10.8% beneath SMA200. Your repair story needs a breakout, not a five-day sermon.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the $0.6826 ceiling is 4.1% away, but MACD is expanding and price is above every listed average by at least 0.5%; ceilings get tested when momentum has this much torque.
Leo, “above SMA200” by just 0.5% is a thin victory lap, while SMA50 remains 10.8% beneath SMA200. Your repair story needs a breakout, not a five-day sermon.
Mara, I see no funding print to confirm a derivatives frenzy. The account skew is modest at 53.0% long and taker flow is 0.99, so the crowd is leaning bullish, not stampeding.
Theo, Bitcoin above $75,000 is a useful tide, but tides reverse with liquidity. VIRTUAL’s 30-day gain is only 4.4%, which says the macro bid has not yet translated into a durable structural trend.
I rule for the bulls: the decisive exhibit is the combination of +17.4% over seven days, an expanding +0.0106 MACD histogram, and price 13.8% above SMA20. This differs from the August 6 and August 7 underweight losses because the current pack shows synchronized short-term momentum plus a Bitcoin move above $75,000, whereas those calls were made before this evidence set. The ruling is invalidated by a daily close below $0.6388, the latest candle’s low, or by MACD histogram turning negative.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
The tape is bullish now: price is 13.8% above SMA20, 12.7% above SMA50, MACD histogram is +0.0106 and expanding, and the 7-day gain is 17.4%. I still see the bearish structural blemish: SMA50 sits 10.8% below SMA200, while RSI 65.7 leaves less room for a clean chase. Direction: bullish; evidence families: moving-average distance, MACD momentum, RSI, multi-period returns; conflicts: bearish SMA50/SMA200 structure and RSI near overbought territory; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Greed is loud at 72, with 53.0% of long accounts and an L/S ratio of 1.13, but taker buy/sell at 0.99 says aggressive demand is not dominating. The crowd is tilted bullish without extreme imbalance; funding is unavailable, and StockTwits provides no usable directional sample with 0 bullish and 0 bearish tags from 2 messages. Direction: bullish; evidence families: Fear&Greed, account skew, taker flow; conflicts: taker buy/sell below 1.00 and absent funding/KOL data; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The news flow is promotional rather than evidentiary, led by AI-token and price-prediction headlines around VIRTUAL. The broader tape has a risk-on assist from Bitcoin pushing past $75,000, but the pack supplies no protocol-specific catalyst or verified fundamental announcement.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack offers no token-supply, revenue, usage, unlock, or valuation metrics for Virtuals Protocol. AI-token visibility is present in the headlines, but that is narrative support, not a measurable fundamental edge.
31b8873777439be8a40fe95c0d35831f2f7f41f7d2a03f81e77c308a3692fd155c21c070ba128f2a35607134962360a82f87d1bc3398b693184c1393829130b0Committed 2026-08-22T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23 · 2026-08-22