CoinVerdict
中文 Scoreboard

VIRTUAL / The Verdict

generated 2026-08-06 02:13 UTC
$0.57
+2.09% · 24h
price as of 2026-08-06 02:13 UTC
Price source
📜 Archived verdict of 2026-08-06 — latest verdict → VIRTUAL
The Verdict
Underweight

Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.

VIRTUAL at $0.5679 gets a 2.09% bounce, but the -14.9% gap below SMA200 keeps the verdict defensive

⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-06 02:13 UTC

Technicalsignal strength Bearish C
Measures how strong the directional signal from price structure is. An analyst lists independent evidence families (trend, momentum, structure) from the data pack; code converts the count to a letter — 3+ families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicting evidence caps the grade at C; insufficient information gets no grade at all. The letter is signal strength — direction is shown separately. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Sentimentsignal strength Bearish C
Same scale as Technical, applied to crowd evidence — fear/greed, positioning, and flow. 3+ independent evidence families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicts cap at C; not enough information, no grade. The letter says how loud the crowd signal is, not which way price will go. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction Longs pay A
Measures perpetual funding-rate pressure — risk, not direction. The smaller the 8-hour normalized rate, the calmer the market: under 0.5 bp = A+, then A, B, C, D as pressure grows, F beyond 10 bp (extreme crowding). Who pays (longs or shorts) is shown separately. Read A+ as “calm”, never as “bullish”. (funding_rule_v1) full scales →
KOL Consensussettled-record quality Archive building
Measures the quality and strength of on-record KOL consensus. Only authors with 20+ settled calls count. The majority share sets the base letter (85%+ = A+ down to 55%+ = D), but few qualified authors cap it — under 5 authors we show the direction and withhold the grade while the record builds. (kol_rule_v1) full scales →

Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.

Track record
4W–0L–2P · 1 neutral · since 2026-07-22
95% CI 51.0–100.0% · n=4 · early sample
2026-08-06 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-13
2026-08-05 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-12
2026-08-04 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-11
2026-08-03 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-10
2026-08-02 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-09
2026-08-01 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-08
2026-07-31 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-07
2026-07-30 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-06
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-29 · VIRTUAL price $0.5687 · BTC $64051
Settled (T+7d)
2026-08-05 · VIRTUAL price $0.5561 · BTC $64023.8
vs BTC
-2.2% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-28 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-28 · VIRTUAL price $0.5647 · BTC $63644.6
Settled (T+7d)
2026-08-04 · VIRTUAL price $0.559 · BTC $63558.1
vs BTC
-0.9% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-27 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-27 · VIRTUAL price $0.5959 · BTC $65216
Settled (T+7d)
2026-08-03 · VIRTUAL price $0.5597 · BTC $63435.7
vs BTC
-3.4% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-26 — Underweight — -3.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-26 · VIRTUAL price $0.5877 · BTC $64416
Settled (T+7d)
2026-08-02 · VIRTUAL price $0.5535 · BTC $62914.5
vs BTC
-3.6% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-24 — Underweight — -5.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-24 · VIRTUAL price $0.6042 · BTC $64928
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-31 · VIRTUAL price $0.5706 · BTC $64779.5
vs BTC
-5.3% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-23 · VIRTUAL price $0.6291 · BTC $66209
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-30 · VIRTUAL price $0.5655 · BTC $64044.7
vs BTC
-7.1% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

stance change · Neutral → Underweight
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -10.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-22 · VIRTUAL price $0.6536 · BTC $65937.6
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-29 · VIRTUAL price $0.5687 · BTC $64051
vs BTC
-10.4% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →

The evidence
Bear evidence ✓ aligns with this verdict
Market state

coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read

Price
Price at verdict$0.5679 +2.1% 24h
60d high0.6826 -16.9%
60d low0.4966 +14.2%
RSI(14)47.0
vs 200d SMA -14.9%
30d change +6.6%
Funding (net) +0.48 bp/8h
Fear & Greed25 · Extreme Fear
Long accounts39.1% long

snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges

Read this ruling three ways

Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.

The Deliberation
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
VS
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
!
THE RISKS — is the uncertainty laid out?
Aggressive desk
Conservative desk
Neutral desk

Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $0.5712 with RSI above 50.0.

⚔ Key clashes
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
TO
Positioning Desk (Theo Okafor)
DV
Macro Desk (Dmitri Volkov)
JA
Risk Committee · Final Ruling
Chief Adjudicator (Aldrich)
DirectionBearish
ConfidenceMedium
HorizonWeeks (swing)
Key support$0.4966
Key resistance$0.5712
InvalidationThe bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $0.5712 with RSI above 50.0.
Main risksExtreme Fear at 25 can fuel a relief rallyContracting MACD histogram may turn positiveSpot remains 14.2% above the 60-day low
KOL Settlement Seat
Calls on record: 0 up · 0 down

Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind

Analyst notes
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)

The chart is still structurally bearish: price sits 3.3% below SMA20, 1.5% below SMA50, and 14.9% below SMA200. RSI at 47.0 and a contracting MACD histogram of -0.002071 show stabilization, not a confirmed reversal.

Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)

Extreme Fear at 25 is a contrarian spark, but only 39.1% of long accounts and a 0.64 long/short ratio show that bullish crowding is absent. Taker buy/sell at 0.96 still leans defensive, while StockTwits had 0 messages to interpret.

Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)

The headline set is dominated by price-prediction and distribution pieces, not a fresh protocol catalyst. Broader crypto headlines about RedotPay defending against Binance litigation and congressional campaigning do not provide a VIRTUAL-specific fundamental impulse.

Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)

The pack provides no operating, revenue, token-unlock, or adoption metrics for Virtuals Protocol. Distribution-chart coverage exists, but without quantified supply data it cannot override the bearish market structure.

Provenance
Report fingerprint
1360338e1b759ad9095bd683b58fa6bdc948b7a21da64ef9aa4d08bc1ed4110b
UTC date
2026-08-06

Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain

SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.

Recent verdicts
Related verdicts