SUN / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
SUN’s 36.4 RSI bounce faces a 0.01614 floor and a 0.01949 ceiling
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-21 02:50 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Mixed
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Neutral — -6.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -11.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -12.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Neutral — -19.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -17.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Neutral — -13.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — +2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +4.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +3.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Neutral — +0.3% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Neutral — -2.6% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Neutral — -0.1% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Neutral — +1.5% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Neutral — -1.5% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -0.2% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -0.5% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 4 exchanges
Invalidation: A close above 0.01949 would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.01614 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your 36.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your 36. Key support to defend sits near $0.01614. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, colleagues: SUN is 3.5% beneath SMA50 and down 5.9% over 30 days. But RSI at 36.4 is already pressed toward the floor, MACD is contracting its bearish histogram, and SMA50 still sits 1.2% above SMA200; that’s a bruised spring, not a dead engine. My recent underweight calls on August 8 and August 7 lost at +4.0% and +3.0% versus BTC, so the bear case has already been punished when relative momentum snapped back.
Leo, your 36.4 RSI is not a reversal—it’s a receipt for weak demand. SUN remains below every short- and medium-term average, with the 60-day high still 10.8% away; calling a contracting negative MACD a spring is hopium dressed as arithmetic. The August 8 and August 7 underweight losses prove only that this token can squeeze, not that the current structure has repaired.
I see more upside than the ruling admits: RSI is 36.4, MACD’s -8.453e-05 histogram is contracting, and SUN is only 7.8% above 0.01614 support. With Bitcoin above $75,000 and legal headlines active, a move toward 0.01949 could be underpriced.
The fastest failure point is the 0.01614 support. Greed at 72, 51.3% long accounts, and SUN sitting below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200 make that exhibit fragile; a break would expose how little demand the 36.4 RSI has actually attracted.
Leo overreaches by treating RSI 36.4 and a contracting negative MACD as proof of reversal; Mara overreaches if she ignores the 1.2% bullish SMA50/SMA200 structure. The deciding condition is whether SUN holds 0.01614 or breaks it, while the settled record shows two recent underweight losses—August 8 at +4.0% versus BTC and August 7 at +3.0%—so a squeeze risk is real.
· Oversold rebound from RSI 36.4
· Bitcoin-led liquidity surge
· Court-headline catalyst
Invalidation: A close above 0.01949 would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the price is 0.017395, only 7.8% above the 0.01614 60-day low; that asymmetry is why washed-out momentum matters. Your 10.8% distance from the high ignores that the moving-average structure is still bullish.
Leo, 7.8% above support is not asymmetry when the token is already below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200. A 1.2% SMA50-over-SMA200 spread is a thin technical relic against a 5.9% monthly slide.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the price is 0.017395, only 7.8% above the 0.01614 60-day low; that asymmetry is why washed-out momentum matters. Your 10.8% distance from the high ignores that the moving-average structure is still bullish.
Leo, 7.8% above support is not asymmetry when the token is already below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200. A 1.2% SMA50-over-SMA200 spread is a thin technical relic against a 5.9% monthly slide.
I’m with Mara on the crowd read: Fear&Greed at 72 and a 51.3% long-account share show optimism without capitulation. Yet the 1.05 taker ratio is balanced enough that outright downside crowding is absent; SUN needs a catalyst, not a funding squeeze—funding was not provided.
Bitcoin above $75,000 is the liquidity tailwind, but SUN has still lost 3.5% in seven days. Macro beta is carrying the umbrella; SUN is standing in the rain.
I rule for the bear side: SUN’s price structure below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200 is the decisive exhibit, reinforced by the 5.9% 30-day decline. This ruling differs from the August 8 and August 7 losing underweight calls because today’s pack shows a defined 0.01614 support test alongside persistent multi-average weakness, not merely relative-performance outcomes. I overturn it if SUN closes above 0.01949, the 60-day high.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
RSI sits at 36.4, while SUN trades 2.6% below SMA20, 3.5% below SMA50, and 2.3% below SMA200. The contracting MACD histogram at -8.453e-05 and 7d loss of 3.5% keep the tape heavy, despite SMA50 sitting 1.2% above SMA200.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Greed is loud at 72, but the crowd is barely leaning long: 51.3% long accounts, a 1.05 long/short ratio, and a 1.05 taker buy/sell ratio. StockTwits supplied zero messages, so there’s no grassroots confirmation behind the optimism.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Justin Sun’s court headlines provide a narrative spark, while Bitcoin pushing past $75,000 supplies a favorable macro backdrop. Neither headline has translated into SUN strength: the token is down 5.9% over 30 days.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack offers legal-news catalysts but no token-economics, supply, revenue, adoption, or valuation metrics. Fundamental conviction is therefore limited to headline sensitivity rather than measurable network improvement.
b43c2f5fce96da809f2ea3aa0ad092912f3730c53c29398ad95b7b9557cada5b5c21c070ba128f2a35607134962360a82f87d1bc3398b693184c1393829130b0Committed 2026-08-22T00:20:00+00:00 · 92 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23