PYTH / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
PYTH sits at $0.03853 with RSI 40.6 and a 19.1% 30-day slide
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-19 01:52 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -10.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +0.5% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +10.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +4.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +7.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +9.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -7.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Neutral — -11.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -14.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -11.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Neutral — -6.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Neutral — -14.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -10.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Overweight — -5.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A close above $0.04200 accompanied by RSI above 50 overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.03083 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that is precisely the hopium trap: a contracting negative MACD histogram is not a reversal, and RSI 40.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that is precisely the hopium trap: a contracting negative MACD histogram is not a reversal, and RSI 40. Key support to defend sits near $0.03083. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: PYTH is down 19.1% over 30 days and trades 12.5% beneath its SMA200. But the MACD histogram is contracting at -0.0001026, RSI is 40.6 rather than deeply oversold, and the 0.03083 60-day low leaves a defined floor; the damage may already be stale. The recent underweight calls on August 8, 6, 5, and 4 lost against BTC by 5.9%, 4.5%, 7.6%, and 9.1%, so simply extrapolating weakness has already been punished.
Leo, that is precisely the hopium trap: a contracting negative MACD histogram is not a reversal, and RSI 40.6 is nowhere near capitulation. PYTH remains below every listed moving average, with SMA50 still 3.2% below SMA200 in a bearish structure; the 60-day high at $0.05229 is 26.4% away, while the recent floor is only a reference point, not support proven by demand. Yes, the August 8, 6, 5, and 4 underweight calls lost 5.9%, 4.5%, 7.6%, and 9.1% versus BTC—but that record argues against false certainty, not for ignoring today’s trend.
· short-term rebound against the recent losing underweight record
· MACD contraction developing into a reversal
· unquantified policy or adoption catalyst
Invalidation: A close above $0.04200 accompanied by RSI above 50 overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 24-hour move is +0.758%, and the MACD contraction says selling pressure is losing force. Why treat a $0.03083 low as irrelevant when the market is already fearful at 46?
Because Theo’s flow evidence cuts against you, Leo: taker buy/sell is 0.88 and the account L/S ratio is 0.90. Fear at 46 is not a catalyst; it is confirmation that buyers are still failing to take control.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(6)
Mara, the 24-hour move is +0.758%, and the MACD contraction says selling pressure is losing force. Why treat a $0.03083 low as irrelevant when the market is already fearful at 46?
Because Theo’s flow evidence cuts against you, Leo: taker buy/sell is 0.88 and the account L/S ratio is 0.90. Fear at 46 is not a catalyst; it is confirmation that buyers are still failing to take control.
I’ll sharpen that, Leo: only 47.4% of long accounts remain, so this isn’t crowded-long exuberance. But Mara gets the immediate tape—sub-1.0 taker flow means the pressure is still seller-led, and funding is unavailable, so no funding-based squeeze case is supportable.
Everyone is trying to make a macro headline do technical work. Cuomo’s crypto-rule warning and Robinhood’s tokenized-stock push are broad liquidity narratives; neither repairs PYTH sitting 9.6% below SMA50 and 12.5% below SMA200.
Dmitri, broad headlines may be weak, but a 40.6 RSI with a contracting MACD can turn before the moving averages do. The question is whether the next move reaches $0.03083, not whether the long-term averages look pretty.
And that is why the ruling should stay bearish, Leo: price is already at $0.03853, only 24.8% above the 60-day low, with 7-day performance at -4.1%. A floor without improving taker flow is a line on a chart, not evidence.
I rule for the bear side: underweight. The decisive exhibit is the synchronized trend failure—PYTH is 2.9% below SMA20, 9.6% below SMA50, and 12.5% below SMA200, with SMA50 3.2% beneath SMA200. The recent August 4, 5, 6, and 8 underweight losses show this call is not automatically safe, but today’s combination of negative MACD, 0.88 taker flow, and a -19.1% 30-day trend differs from those rebounds by keeping pressure visible across both price structure and flow. I overturn this ruling if PYTH closes above $0.04200 while RSI rises above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m bearish. Evidence families: moving-average structure, RSI, MACD, and multi-horizon price trend. Price is 2.9% below SMA20, 9.6% below SMA50, and 12.5% below SMA200; RSI is 40.6 and MACD histogram remains negative at -0.0001026, though contracting. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m bearish. Evidence families: Fear & Greed, account skew, and taker flow. Fear & Greed is 46, only 47.4% of long accounts remain, the L/S ratio is 0.90, and taker buy/sell is 0.88; StockTwits supplied zero messages, so that channel is unusable. Conflicts: sentiment is already fearful rather than euphoric. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m not letting speculative 2027 price-prediction headlines dress up the tape. The actionable news is sparse: a reported SEC trade-through-rule challenge may matter to market structure, while broader U.S. crypto-rule headlines are sector-level rather than a PYTH catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I see no hard token-economics or valuation figures in the pack that can offset the chart. The only coin-specific policy item is the SEC trade-through-rule discussion involving a Pyth contributor, but its earnings or adoption impact is not quantified.
b7566bf3d629d47bed47480abb21dee6a1c64aa6204bf03632ba608549c7adcb0f1b74c5d5aa8bd9fe0e079b811d2482b9bd27566afea1ff19e554ca5230c439Committed 2026-08-20T00:20:00+00:00 · 73 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23