CoinVerdict
中文 Scoreboard

PYTH / The Verdict

generated 2026-07-31 01:17 UTC
$0.04
+2.09% · 24h
price as of 2026-07-31 01:17 UTC
Price source
📜 Archived verdict of 2026-07-31 — latest verdict → PYTH
The Verdict
Underweight

PYTH at $0.04099 is a fragile rebound beneath a bearish moving-average structure

⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-31 01:17 UTC

Technicalsignal strength Bearish C
Measures how strong the directional signal from price structure is. An analyst lists independent evidence families (trend, momentum, structure) from the data pack; code converts the count to a letter — 3+ families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicting evidence caps the grade at C; insufficient information gets no grade at all. The letter is signal strength — direction is shown separately. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Sentimentsignal strength Bearish C
Same scale as Technical, applied to crowd evidence — fear/greed, positioning, and flow. 3+ independent evidence families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicts cap at C; not enough information, no grade. The letter says how loud the crowd signal is, not which way price will go. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction Longs pay A
Measures perpetual funding-rate pressure — risk, not direction. The smaller the 8-hour normalized rate, the calmer the market: under 0.5 bp = A+, then A, B, C, D as pressure grows, F beyond 10 bp (extreme crowding). Who pays (longs or shorts) is shown separately. Read A+ as “calm”, never as “bullish”. (funding_rule_v1) full scales →
KOL Consensussettled-record quality Archive building
Measures the quality and strength of on-record KOL consensus. Only authors with 20+ settled calls count. The majority share sets the base letter (85%+ = A+ down to 55%+ = D), but few qualified authors cap it — under 5 authors we show the direction and withhold the grade while the record builds. (kol_rule_v1) full scales →

Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.

Track record
3W–1L–1P · 3 neutral · since 2026-07-15
95% CI 30.1–95.4% · n=4 · early sample
2026-07-31 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-07
2026-07-30 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-06
2026-07-29 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-05
2026-07-28 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-04
2026-07-27 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-03
2026-07-26 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-02
stance change · Neutral → Underweight
2026-07-24 — Neutral · Settling — verdict due 2026-07-31
stance change · Underweight → Neutral
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -14.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-23 · PYTH price $0.04889 · BTC $66209
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-30 · PYTH price $0.04027 · BTC $64044.7
vs BTC
-14.8% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

stance change · Neutral → Underweight
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -11.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-22 · PYTH price $0.04732 · BTC $65937.6
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-29 · PYTH price $0.04075 · BTC $64051
vs BTC
-11.3% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-21 — Neutral — -6.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-21 · PYTH price $0.04732 · BTC $65161.4
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-28 · PYTH price $0.04317 · BTC $63644.6
vs BTC
-6.6% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-20 — Neutral — -14.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-20 · PYTH price $0.04988 · BTC $63745.4
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-27 · PYTH price $0.04383 · BTC $65216
vs BTC
-14.1% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

stance change · Underweight → Neutral
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-19 · PYTH price $0.04838 · BTC $64708.7
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-26 · PYTH price $0.04294 · BTC $64416
vs BTC
-10.8% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-17 — Underweight — -10.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-17 · PYTH price $0.05072 · BTC $63739.1
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-24 · PYTH price $0.04637 · BTC $64928
vs BTC
-10.3% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-16 · PYTH price $0.0481 · BTC $64777.8
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-23 · PYTH price $0.04889 · BTC $66209
vs BTC
-0.6% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

stance change · Overweight → Underweight
2026-07-15 — Overweight — -5.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-15 · PYTH price $0.04893 · BTC $65000.1
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-22 · PYTH price $0.04749 · BTC $66588
vs BTC
-5.3% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →

The evidence
Bear evidence ✓ aligns with this verdict
Market state

coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read

Price
Price at verdict$0.04099 +2.1% 24h
60d high0.05229 -21.7%
60d low0.02942 +39.1%
RSI(14)42.5
vs 200d SMA -11.1%
30d change +8.9%
Funding (net) +0.65 bp/8h
Fear & Greed25 · Extreme Fear
Long accounts44.4% long

snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges

Read this ruling three ways

Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.

The Deliberation
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
VS
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
⚔ Key clashes
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
TO
Positioning Desk (Theo Okafor)
DV
Macro Desk (Dmitri Volkov)
JA
Risk Committee · Final Ruling
Chief Adjudicator (Aldrich)
DirectionBearish
ConfidenceHigh
HorizonWeeks (swing)
Key support$0.02942
Key resistance$0.05229
InvalidationA sustained break and hold above $0.05229 would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Main risksExtreme-fear short squeezeCXMT coverage gaining adoption momentumBroad crypto risk appetite reversing
KOL Settlement Seat
Calls on record: 0 up · 0 down

Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind

Analyst notes
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)

Direction: bearish. Evidence families: RSI(14) 42.5, price 10.1% below SMA20 and 11.1% below SMA200, SMA50 10.3% below SMA200, contracting MACD histogram. Conflicts: 30d performance is +8.9% and MACD downside momentum is contracting. Sufficiency: adequate.

Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)

Direction: bearish. Evidence families: Fear&Greed 25, only 44.4% long accounts, L/S ratio 0.80, taker buy/sell 0.98. Conflicts: extreme fear can support a contrarian bounce, and 24h price action is +2.092%. Sufficiency: adequate.

Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)

The headline tape is more risk-off than catalytic: Strategy booked an $8.2 billion Q2 Bitcoin loss, while Coinbase fell 5% after missing revenue estimates. PYTH-specific coverage includes CXMT opening-trade coverage, but the pack also records a 4.4% PYTH drop amid technical weakness; that is not a durable catalyst stack.

Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)

The pack gives one concrete ecosystem development—Pyth announced coverage of CXMT from its opening trade—but provides no token-supply, revenue, valuation, or adoption figures. I cannot underwrite a months-long fundamental rerating from that single announcement.

Provenance
Report fingerprint
f41ea88f438cab53197f6a5423e5004dac0cafa3be275d3828ea957822058a08
UTC date
2026-07-31

Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain

SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.

Recent verdicts
Related verdicts