PYTH / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
PYTH at $0.04027 sits below every major moving average as the rebound loses traction
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-14 01:38 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -10.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — +0.5% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +10.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +5.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +4.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +7.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +9.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -8.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -7.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Neutral — -11.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -14.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -11.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Neutral — -6.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Neutral — -14.1% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -10.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Overweight — -5.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.04052 followed by a reclaim of SMA20 invalidates the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.03083 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the 5.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the 5. Key support to defend sits near $0.03083. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly number: PYTH is 9.7% below SMA200 and 23.2% under the 60-day high. But the market has already marked that damage; a 7-day gain of 5.7% with RSI only at 45.6 says sellers have not regained control, and the $0.03083 low is still 30.3% beneath spot. Our underweight calls on August 4 and August 5 lost as PYTH beat BTC by 9.1% and 7.6%, so blindly extrapolating the moving averages is stale.
Leo, the 5.7% weekly bounce is exactly the number hopium wants to frame as a reversal, yet PYTH remains below SMA20, SMA50, and SMA200. The MACD histogram is positive but contracting, and the 30-day return is still -15.7%; that is not a repaired trend, it is a pause beneath resistance. The August 4 and August 5 losses prove relative strength can ambush a bearish call, not that this chart has turned.
I think the bearish ruling leaves more downside underpriced: PYTH is still 23.2% below the $0.05229 high, and the $0.04027 spot price has not cleared even the latest $0.04052 intraday high. If the 54.2% long-account share meets another bout of selling, the $0.03083 low becomes the obvious stress point.
The fastest failure is a squeeze through $0.04052, because RSI at 45.6 leaves room for momentum and the 7-day return is already +5.7%. The fragile exhibit is the contracting MACD histogram: it can turn up quickly, repeating the August 4 and August 5 losses of 9.1% and 7.6% versus BTC.
Leo has overreached by treating a 5.7% weekly rise as trend repair; Mara has overreached only if she ignores the recent relative-strength losses. The deciding condition is a sustained close above $0.04052 with recovery over SMA20; absent that, the -4.8% SMA50 gap keeps the bear thesis intact.
· short-term squeeze from Fear sentiment
· relative strength versus BTC
· MACD histogram reversal
Invalidation: A sustained close above $0.04052 followed by a reclaim of SMA20 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Mara, you’re leaning on the 30-day -15.7% as if markets move backward. Price is holding $0.04027, well above the $0.03083 60-day floor, and the recent 7-day recovery is the freshest evidence.
Leo, the freshest evidence still closes below SMA20 at -0.7%; your floor argument needs a break above $0.04052 first, not a glance at distance from the low.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re leaning on the 30-day -15.7% as if markets move backward. Price is holding $0.04027, well above the $0.03083 60-day floor, and the recent 7-day recovery is the freshest evidence.
Leo, the freshest evidence still closes below SMA20 at -0.7%; your floor argument needs a break above $0.04052 first, not a glance at distance from the low.
I’ll interrupt both of you: long accounts are 54.2%, L/S is 1.18, and taker buy/sell is 0.78. That is mild long skew with sellers more aggressive at the tape, while funding is unavailable—so there is no funding exhibit to rescue the bull case.
And the macro tape is not offering a liquidity gift: the SEC again delayed the innovation exemption and canceled the Reg Crypto meeting without a new date. PYTH needs its own breakout; policy headlines are not carrying it there.
I rule for the bear side: underweight. The decisive exhibit is the aligned moving-average damage—price is 4.8% below SMA50, 9.7% below SMA200, and SMA50 is 5.2% below SMA200—reinforced by a contracting MACD histogram. This call is different from the August 4 and August 5 losses because the current pack shows both a fading MACD impulse and taker buy/sell at 0.78, whereas those earlier outcomes only establish that relative-strength rebounds can punish stale bearish calls. I overturn this ruling if PYTH closes above $0.04052 and then reclaims SMA20 rather than slipping back below it.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a bearish structure: PYTH is 0.7% below SMA20, 4.8% below SMA50, and 9.7% below SMA200, with SMA50 trailing SMA200 by 5.2%. RSI at 45.6 is not washed out, while the positive MACD histogram is contracting; that is a weak bounce inside a broader downtrend.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Fear&Greed at 29 shows broad fear, but the crowd is not cleanly capitulated: long accounts still lead at 54.2%, the L/S ratio is 1.18, and taker buy/sell is only 0.78. The two StockTwits messages were both bullish, but that sample is too thin to matter.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline tape offers no direct PYTH catalyst. SEC delays around tokenization and Reg Crypto keep the regulatory backdrop unresolved, while the local news list is mostly price-prediction, conversion, and market-data coverage.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The data pack provides no token-supply, unlock, revenue, adoption, or valuation evidence. Without fundamental support, the verdict must rest on PYTH's price structure and market behavior.
904732fc955615e62e0da88a66ed0dd9808d1deefc0371ad2db78bfdcc932b7753f40f609f1c3a40d35f95df8482a1a109627902af10da6eeb4433219b8978bcCommitted 2026-08-15T00:20:00+00:00 · 95 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23