FET / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
FET’s 0.158 bounce meets a bearish trend: price sits 21.8% below SMA200
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-26 00:45 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-30 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +3.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Overweight — -5.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Overweight — -10.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Neutral — -8.8% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -9.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Underweight — +6.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — +11.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +5.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -7.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -5.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -7.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +6.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +3.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -5.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -7.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -7.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +2.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +0.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -3.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -4.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.166 with RSI above 50 would invalidate the bearish swing verdict.. Cautious read: a break below $0.15 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “dry tinder” is sitting beside a leaking fuel tank.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “dry tinder” is sitting beside a leaking fuel tank. Key support to defend sits near $0.15. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: FET is 21.8% under SMA200 and 45.3% below 0.2888. But that damage is old news and heavily priced in; RSI is only 42.9, MACD histogram is expanding at +0.001173, and price is pressing just 5.3% above the 0.15 floor. A 3.813% daily rebound with fear at 26 is the kind of dry tinder that can spark a squeeze.
Leo, your “dry tinder” is sitting beside a leaking fuel tank. FET remains 10.2% below SMA50, the SMA50 is 12.9% below SMA200, and takers are selling harder than buying at 0.96. The 0.15 floor is not support until it survives an attack; at present, the structure says the rebound is a countertrend flicker.
· MACD histogram expansion at +0.001173
· 3.813% 24h rebound near 0.15 support
· AI-sector headline momentum
Invalidation: A sustained move above 0.166 with RSI above 50 would invalidate the bearish swing verdict.
Mara, you’re treating moving averages like gravity. Price is only 0.1% below SMA20, MACD is expanding, and 0.15 is a defined nearby line in the sand.
Leo, the line is nearby because the market is already leaning on it. A 30d loss of 11.1% and price 21.8% below SMA200 make your SMA20 comparison decorative.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, you’re treating moving averages like gravity. Price is only 0.1% below SMA20, MACD is expanding, and 0.15 is a defined nearby line in the sand.
Leo, the line is nearby because the market is already leaning on it. A 30d loss of 11.1% and price 21.8% below SMA200 make your SMA20 comparison decorative.
Leo, I’ll give you the fear setup, but the tape doesn’t confirm it: longs are 51.1%, L/S is 1.05, and taker buy/sell is 0.96. That’s mildly crowded optimism, not clean contrarian capitulation.
Mara has the regime argument. A bounce of 3.813% is easy to manufacture in a weak liquidity tape; until FET reclaims 0.166 or stronger trend levels, I’m selling the macro fantasy.
I award the winning side to Mara and Dmitri: the decisive exhibit is the 12.9% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread, reinforced by FET’s 11.1% 30d decline. I would overturn this ruling on a sustained reclaim above 0.166 with RSI above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a damaged chart, not a reversal: FET is 10.2% below SMA50 and 21.8% below SMA200, while SMA50 trails SMA200 by 12.9%. RSI at 42.9 and MACD histogram at +0.001173 show a tentative rebound inside a broader downtrend; my direction is bearish, evidence families are moving averages, RSI/MACD, and support-resistance, conflicts are the positive MACD expansion and 7d gain of 0.8%, sufficiency is adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read fear at 26, but the crowd hasn’t fully capitulated: long accounts are still 51.1%, the L/S ratio is 1.05, and taker buy/sell is only 0.96. That leaves fragile dip-buyers exposed near the 0.15 low; my direction is bearish, evidence families are Fear & Greed, account positioning, and taker flow, conflicts are the modest 24h gain of 3.813% and 7d gain of 0.8%, sufficiency is adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I find promotional AI headlines around Fetch.ai, including claims about smart AI traders and a Goodwood FOS partnership, but no pack evidence of a material earnings, adoption, or regulatory catalyst. Broader headlines on Sberbank’s crypto infrastructure and North Korean laundering arrests are sector context, not FET-specific fuel.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I have no hard token-economics, revenue, usage, or supply figures in this pack to underwrite a months-long thesis. The narrative is AI-positive, but narrative headlines cannot offset a price 45.3% below the 60d high of 0.2888.
f28350ac84026d81383ee6a2196a22debffada54316f3e6de06be02222cf9345abe367d9f6473120ab57274a47b2717a285a90e3afdaff7e89e6c5e549a3ca83Committed 2026-07-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25