DOT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
DOT’s 36.3% discount to its 200-day SMA keeps the verdict bearish despite a +0.00519 MACD histogram
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-22 08:53 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -9.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -5.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Neutral — -3.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +6.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +9.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +13.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +8.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-14 — Neutral — — — VOID
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained close above 0.8578 followed by a reclaim of SMA50 would invalidate the bearish swing verdict.. Cautious read: a break below $0.795 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your +0.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your +0. Key support to defend sits near $0.795. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: DOT sits 36.3% below its SMA200 and the 50/200 structure is bearish by 31.9%. But RSI is only 44.0, not capitulation, and the MACD histogram is expanding at +0.00519; that’s a live rebound engine while fear at 33 has already poisoned the tape.
Leo, your +0.00519 MACD reading is a spark inside a collapsing trend, not a repaired chart. Price is still 6.5% below SMA50, down 10.0% over 30 days, and only 5.9% above the 60-day low at 0.795—your rebound thesis has no structural proof.
· MACD rebound strengthens
· Fear-driven short squeeze
· Broad crypto risk-on reversal
Invalidation: A sustained close above 0.8578 followed by a reclaim of SMA50 would invalidate the bearish swing verdict.
Mara, the 0.795 low is close enough to define risk, not proof of an imminent breakdown. A move back above today’s 0.8578 high would show the sellers are losing control.
Leo, that’s a tiny hurdle against a 1.309 60-day high, still 35.7% away. The market would need to reclaim SMA50 first; until then, your MACD is hopium with a histogram.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 0.795 low is close enough to define risk, not proof of an imminent breakdown. A move back above today’s 0.8578 high would show the sellers are losing control.
Leo, that’s a tiny hurdle against a 1.309 60-day high, still 35.7% away. The market would need to reclaim SMA50 first; until then, your MACD is hopium with a histogram.
I’m with Mara on the positioning exhibit: 64.9% of accounts are long, yet taker buy/sell is only 0.97. That’s crowded directional belief without aggressive buying, a poor setup for the bulls.
And I’ll add the macro stain: Bitcoin is under $66,000 while traders wait for Alphabet earnings. In that liquidity-sensitive setting, a weak altcoin usually doesn’t get rescued by a mild momentum uptick.
I pick the bears, and the decisive exhibit is DOT’s 36.3% gap below SMA200 combined with a 10.0% 30-day decline. The long crowd at 64.9% creates liquidation fuel rather than support. I overturn this ruling only if DOT closes above 0.8578 and then reclaims SMA50; a break below 0.795 confirms the bearish case.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura, and DOT is below every major trend anchor: 1.1% under SMA20, 6.5% under SMA50, and 36.3% under SMA200. RSI at 44.0 is soft rather than washed out, while the expanding +0.00519 MACD histogram is only a countertrend spark.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes, and fear is real at 33, but the crowd is still leaning long: 64.9% long accounts and a 1.85 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell at 0.97 says buyers aren’t pressing hard enough to validate that optimism.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh, and the headline tape is mostly prediction and post-rally speculation, not a fresh catalyst. Bitcoin below $66,000 and traders waiting on Alphabet earnings keep the broader risk backdrop fragile.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand, and this data pack provides no new token-economics, adoption, issuance, or governance evidence to support a fundamental rerating. The actionable evidence is therefore overwhelmingly price- and positioning-led.
81298eb6b070e076af92d2dd18fbe345f535cd6a3da2dbd79cb0fd435cf14e6cd60befb007b8b2c9bb2f3e860a595495bb4427a42c1d8f8851947ca5b9c4caf9Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 98 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25