DOT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
DOT sits at $0.835, 37.8% below its 200-day average as sellers retain control
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-19 06:06 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — +2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Underweight — +1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -9.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -9.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -5.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -6.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Neutral — -3.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +0.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +4.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +6.1% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +9.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +13.2% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +8.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -0.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -1.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -4.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -5.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -6.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -5.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -1.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-14 — Neutral — — — VOID
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.851, the approximate SMA20 level implied by DOT at $0.835 being 1.9% below it, would overturn the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.795 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, that MACD number is contracting, not expanding, and price remains below every major average: 1.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, that MACD number is contracting, not expanding, and price remains below every major average: 1. Key support to defend sits near $0.795. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number, Mara: DOT is 37.8% below SMA200 and down 13.1% over 30 days. But RSI at 40.1 is bruised rather than capitulated, the 60-day low is only $0.795, and the positive MACD histogram at +0.005796 says the downside engine is losing torque.
Leo, that MACD number is contracting, not expanding, and price remains below every major average: 1.9% under SMA20, 9.2% under SMA50, and 37.8% under SMA200. A token sitting 4.9% above its 60-day low with 64.9% of accounts long is not a bargain chart; it’s a crowded ledge.
· short-term reflex rally from RSI 40.1
· crowded longs may already be partly flushed
· missing funding data could conceal a squeeze setup
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.851, the approximate SMA20 level implied by DOT at $0.835 being 1.9% below it, would overturn the bearish ruling.
Mara, the 60-day low at $0.795 is close enough to define risk, and RSI 40.1 leaves room for a reflex rally. You’re treating a damaged trend as if every bounce must fail.
Leo, I’m treating the trend as guilty until price retakes SMA20. At $0.835, DOT is already 1.9% below it, and the 30-day loss is 13.1%—the bounce case has no proof.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low at $0.795 is close enough to define risk, and RSI 40.1 leaves room for a reflex rally. You’re treating a damaged trend as if every bounce must fail.
Leo, I’m treating the trend as guilty until price retakes SMA20. At $0.835, DOT is already 1.9% below it, and the 30-day loss is 13.1%—the bounce case has no proof.
Leo, the positioning tape sides with Mara: 1.85 long/short and 64.9% long accounts, while taker buy/sell is 0.99. That’s latent sell fuel, not confirmation; funding is absent, so I won’t invent a squeeze signal.
I’m with the bear on the macro read. The headlines offer no DOT-specific catalyst, and a coin 37.8% below SMA200 needs liquidity and a catalyst—neither appears in this pack.
I rule for the bears, with the decisive exhibit being DOT’s 31.5% bearish SMA50-versus-SMA200 spread alongside 64.9% long accounts. The chart can invalidate me only if DOT reclaims $0.841 and then sustains above SMA20, currently implied at roughly $0.851 from the stated 1.9% discount.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a damaged chart: DOT is 9.2% below SMA50 and 37.8% below SMA200, while the SMA50 sits 31.5% under the SMA200. RSI at 40.1 and a contracting +0.005796 MACD histogram suggest weak stabilization, not a confirmed reversal.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read fear at 28, but the crowd is still leaning long: 64.9% of accounts are long with a 1.85 long/short ratio. Taker buy/sell at 0.99 shows no meaningful buying aggression, so fear has not yet flushed the bullish positioning.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The supplied headlines focus on Zcash privacy, Polymarket restrictions, digital-native banking, Bitcoin governance, and Brazilian payments. None provides a direct DOT catalyst, leaving the coin to trade on its own weak structure.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
The pack offers no DOT-specific adoption, revenue, development, issuance, or valuation data. The broader payments and privacy headlines are thematically relevant to crypto, but they do not establish a fundamental bid for DOT.
aee8506113516e445af31a1956cc3ee1862140b6c78cbdce10eb3a8b3a73b79ff4fc7312c5be5f7d7eea56f69a8be2b8607d9ddd9672db388d49defd4b1498d1Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25