BSV / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
BSV at $13.67 has bounced 11.2% in 30 days, but the bearish moving-average structure still caps the swing
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-27 00:59 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Mixed
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Mixed
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-31 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-30 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-29 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-28 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-27 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-26 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -3.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Overweight — -5.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — -3.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Overweight — -11.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Overweight — -7.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Neutral — -0.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Overweight — +11.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Neutral — +14.3% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +15.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +12.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +11.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +11.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +9.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +9.8% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +6.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Neutral — -4.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -2.5% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -6.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -4.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Neutral — -2.3% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 1 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained close above the $15.30 60-day high would invalidate the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $13.64 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: I’m Mara Frost.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: I’m Mara Frost. Key support to defend sits near $13.64. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’m Leo Vance. I’ll concede the ugliest number: BSV sits 8.6% below SMA200 and the SMA50 is 14.0% under it. But price is already grinding 6.2% above SMA50, up 11.2% over 30 days, with RSI at 53.2—not overheated, just enough fuel for a push toward the $15.30 60-day high. The old wreckage is visible; the tape is trying to climb out of it.
I’m Mara Frost. Leo’s 11.2% is the bait, not the proof: the market still printed only 0.4% over seven days and closed at $13.67, 10.7% below $15.30. His preferred upside is a 14.0% bearish SMA50/SMA200 spread, while the contracting -0.01886 MACD histogram says the bounce is losing thrust. Calling that a breakout is hopium wearing a charting jacket.
· 30-day momentum of +11.2%
· taker buy/sell at 1.08
· fear-driven short squeeze
Invalidation: A sustained close above the $15.30 60-day high would invalidate the bearish ruling.
Mara, the $10.37 low is 31.8% below spot, while RSI 53.2 leaves room to run. You’re treating a damaged long-term chart as if it forbids a tactical rally.
Leo, tactical rallies fail when buyers are already leaning: 61.7% long accounts and a 1.61 ratio give sellers ammunition. Break $13.64 and your neat rebound thesis starts leaking.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the $10.37 low is 31.8% below spot, while RSI 53.2 leaves room to run. You’re treating a damaged long-term chart as if it forbids a tactical rally.
Leo, tactical rallies fail when buyers are already leaning: 61.7% long accounts and a 1.61 ratio give sellers ammunition. Break $13.64 and your neat rebound thesis starts leaking.
I’m Theo Okafor. Taker flow at 1.08 is a real, if thin, buyer advantage; there’s no funding-rate data to claim leverage is cheap or crowded on derivatives. Spot demand helps Leo, but the long-account skew prevents a clean bullish read.
I’m Dmitri Volkov. Fear & Greed at 30 is not a liquidity regime; it’s merely a mood gauge. Until BSV reclaims $15.30, the market is paying for relief, not pricing a durable macro bid.
I’m Judge Aldrich. The bear side wins on the decisive exhibit: BSV remains 8.6% below SMA200 while SMA50 sits 14.0% beneath SMA200. I rule bearish for weeks, with $13.64 as immediate support and $15.30 as resistance; a sustained close above $15.30 overturns my ruling.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I’m Kai Nakamura. BSV trades 1.5% above SMA20 and 6.2% above SMA50, yet remains 8.6% below SMA200. RSI 53.2 and a contracting MACD histogram at -0.01886 say rebound, not trend reversal. Direction: mixed; evidence families: moving averages, RSI, MACD, price structure; conflicts: short-term recovery versus SMA50/SMA200 bearish alignment; sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I’m Sofia Reyes. Fear & Greed is only 30, while long accounts already hold 61.7% and the long/short ratio is 1.61. Taker buy/sell at 1.08 gives buyers a modest edge, but crowded longs leave the rebound vulnerable to a flush. Direction: mixed; evidence families: Fear & Greed, account positioning, taker flow; conflicts: fearful crowd versus long-heavy positioning; sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
I’m Ed Walsh. The headlines offer a tokenization test involving LG CNS and South Korea, but none of the listed items establishes a direct BSV catalyst. Price-prediction coverage is narrative, not evidence; the news case is background noise until adoption connects specifically to BSV.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
I’m Priya Anand. The pack provides no fresh network-usage, revenue, issuance, or valuation figures for BSV. A tokenization headline may help the broader crypto narrative, but it cannot justify a fundamental rerating of BSV from this evidence alone.
15fc2ebd5e1f459bb35be048354be07729c862cfa4b9964d8abcfe4466bde109ace92be1bfed0b9c7e7a863093b8afefb792907be0285e95e6b33ca637a34faeCommitted 2026-07-28T00:20:00+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24