ATOM / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
ATOM sits at $1.493 as the 60-day floor at $1.443 comes into view
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-21 00:18 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-29 — Underweight — -1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-28 — Neutral — -3.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -2.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — -7.7% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Neutral — -5.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Neutral — -11.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Overweight — -12.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Neutral — -12.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -3.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Neutral — -5.2% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Neutral — -2.1% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Neutral — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — +10.0% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Neutral — +13.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Neutral — +12.6% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — +5.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +5.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +2.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +5.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +9.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +8.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — +4.9% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -10.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -9.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -9.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -10.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — -6.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -7.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -7.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-14 — Neutral — — — VOID
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $1.493 with RSI above 50 and price holding above the $1.443 support zone.. Cautious read: a break below $1.44 voids this research. Confidence Medium — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, the RSI is not a buy signal when the whole moving-average stack is breaking downhill.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, the RSI is not a buy signal when the whole moving-average stack is breaking downhill. Key support to defend sits near $1.44. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugly number first: ATOM is down 15.0% over 30 days and trades 22.4% under its SMA200. But RSI at 35.1 is already bruised, Extreme Fear at 25 is widely advertised, and the MACD histogram is expanding at +0.002694—this is the kind of stale pessimism that can fuel a snapback from the $1.443 floor.
Leo, the RSI is not a buy signal when the whole moving-average stack is breaking downhill. ATOM is still 11.0% below SMA50, 3.6% below SMA20, and the SMA50 sits 12.8% below SMA200; your +0.002694 MACD is a candle flicker against a collapsing trend.
· MACD rebound at +0.002694
· Extreme Fear reversal from 25
· Support-driven short squeeze
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is invalidated by a sustained move above $1.493 with RSI above 50 and price holding above the $1.443 support zone.
Mara, the 60-day low is only 3.5% below $1.493, so the downside is compressed while a recovery toward $2.297 offers room.
Leo, that $2.297 target is 35.0% away because buyers have failed repeatedly; proximity to support is not proof that support holds.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, the 60-day low is only 3.5% below $1.493, so the downside is compressed while a recovery toward $2.297 offers room.
Leo, that $2.297 target is 35.0% away because buyers have failed repeatedly; proximity to support is not proof that support holds.
I’ll add the positioning wrinkle: 53.4% of accounts are long, with a 1.15 L/S ratio and taker flow at 1.03. That is mild bullish leaning—not a crowded short—but it also leaves longs available as forced-sale fuel.
And without funding data, nobody gets to call the squeeze. In a weak liquidity regime, an RSI near 35 can stay early rather than become a reversal.
I rule for the bears, and the single decisive exhibit is the bearish moving-average structure: SMA50 is 12.8% below SMA200 while price is 22.4% below SMA200. I would overturn this ruling only if ATOM reclaims $1.493 and then breaks decisively above the SMA50 reference, or if RSI rises above 50 while price holds above $1.443.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Kai Nakamura: ATOM is below every major average: -3.6% versus SMA20, -11.0% versus SMA50, and -22.4% versus SMA200. RSI at 35.1 and MACD histogram at +0.002694 show a bounce attempt, but the -12.8% SMA50/SMA200 structure keeps the chart bearish.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Sofia Reyes: Extreme Fear at 25 and only 53.4% long accounts show a damaged crowd, not capitulation. The 1.15 long/short ratio and 1.03 taker buy/sell ratio still leave enough optimism for sellers to punish.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Ed Walsh: The ATOM headlines are mostly drift, speculative price targets, a 4% recovery narrative, and an Upbit transfer pause for an upgrade. None supplies a verified catalyst strong enough to overpower a 30-day decline of 15.0%.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Priya Anand: The data pack provides no new token-economic or adoption metrics that justify repricing ATOM. A speculative $300 outlook is headline material, not evidence, while price remains 35.0% below the 60-day high.
e2f9616469a65960f9704b6f97be15cbb09491f8474b4431a5afaa46284ea5cf8493ea2a32b8f699d8d9f64cbb801351e81386c424ce90ba6ee879a91604b285Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 67 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24