CoinVerdict
中文 Scoreboard

@crypto_birb — settled call record

Hit rate · 0 hits · 0 misses · n=0 Archive building (n < 10) avg |move| of hits (absolute, vs USD)

Rate rule: kol_directional_v1 — read the full rule →

Small sample — the interval is wide and the number will move.

In three sentences

What @crypto_birb has been sayingtechnical educator

AI-distilled — our read of 109 public posts from the last 30 days, not their words. Every line links to the original so you can check us.

If you had followed

Follow the calls, or just hold BTC?

-$16following every call
-$2just holding BTC
-$13the difference

0 live · 19 backtested — never merged into one number.

These dollar figures are carried by backtests — hypothetical performance from applying the same rule to past statements, not a live track record. Live records: 0 / 19.

Each call is an independent $100 position, closed after 7 days — no compounding, no fees, no slippage. How this is scored →

Rating and benchmarks
54 Rating ahead of 54% of 22 rated accounts Vs benchmark +10.2pp

Hit rate (all directional calls) 38.1% (n=21 · tracked 475 days)

Benchmark (same direction) 27.9% (as of 2026-09-06)

Peer median 26.2% (of 22 rated accounts)

Percentile (hit rate) 93.2 (of 22 rated accounts)

Tier Average ★★★

Profit-loss ratio 5.74% / 4.56% = 1.3 : 1 (breakeven hit rate 44.2%)

Bull-bear mix ↑ 9 · ↓ 10 · → 2

Rating is computed on every settled directional call — live and backtested together. The prospective-only rate stays on the line above and is never merged into it.

Rating ranks accounts against each other on one shared yardstick. It is not a forecast, and it is not a statement about what following anyone would have earned.

Rating rule: kol_rating_v1 — read the full rule →

Directional record
Backtested records
Hit rate: 38% 8 hits · 13 misses · n=21

No prospective calls settled yet — the rate above stays blank until the first one lands. Everything below is backtested.

Settled after the fact from archived posts — the call was already on the record before we scored it, but we were not watching it live. Kept on a separate line and never merged into the prospective hit rate above.

CoinCallWhat they said Relative (ranked) Absolute (vs USD) SettledSource
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish $BTC 200-DAY BPRO SUPPORT TAGGED MISS +1.7% +1.7% 2026-08-18T20:30:35.113455+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish I wouldn't short key long-term BTC bull market support HIT +3.8% +3.8% 2026-08-18T19:30:05.667711+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish Next one's gonna hurt. MISS +8.1% +8.1% 2026-08-17T10:00:14.225872+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish The standard shape of a mechanical squeeze on overcrowded shorts. As of now, it looks like a typical corrective tide of a larger down move after breaking new long-term lows. HIT -3.5% -3.5% 2026-08-17T09:00:28.654297+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish Bottom line: prepare for further declines. MISS +6.4% +6.4% 2026-08-17T09:00:11.339958+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish Retest of falling SMA200 is NOT bullish. HIT -4.4% -4.4% 2026-08-17T08:00:07.922442+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish Bear market is firm and steady. MISS +4.1% +4.1% 2026-08-17T06:30:09.487384+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish No visible confirmed reversal signs but big move ahead. HIT +3.1% +3.1% 2026-08-17T06:30:04.650099+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish False breakouts perform better in the opposite direction than initially anticipated due to forcing out over leveraged positions to close, creating further slippage. That implies the bears should get fuel up for further squeeze to the downside. MISS +0.1% +0.1% 2026-08-17T06:00:12.104782+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish We are NOT in bull market. MISS +5.7% +5.7% 2026-08-17T06:00:05.314654+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested → Sideways Seasonality model puts us at flat March ahead. HIT -2.8% -2.8% 2026-08-17T05:30:23.812749+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish The setup screams continuation. MISS -9.6% -9.6% 2026-08-17T04:00:08.547780+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish Short-term: bears still in charge MISS +9.1% +9.1% 2026-08-17T03:00:20.287248+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish Trend feels heavy MISS +1.5% +1.5% 2026-08-17T03:00:15.017187+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish Q4 explosion in the making... MISS -2.3% -2.3% 2026-08-17T03:00:07.151690+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish #BTC still high, but under pressure and daily is not looking good either MISS +2.6% +2.6% 2026-08-17T02:30:08.967121+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish Short-term bounce ahead MISS -0.8% -0.8% 2026-08-17T02:30:04.447031+00:00 source post → · verdict →
LINK backtested ↑ Bullish TA Verdict: $LINK > $XRP HIT +23.5% +23.1% 2026-08-17T02:00:29.931927+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↑ Bullish BTC holds strong over key support ($100k, $108.8k). MISS -7.3% -7.3% 2026-08-17T02:00:24.943790+00:00 source post → · verdict →
ETH backtested ↑ Bullish $ETH WEEKLY BREAKOUT CONFIRMED HIT +4.3% +2.1% 2026-08-17T02:00:20.152798+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested → Sideways Daily Trailer bear mode + 12H Trailer bull mode = flat HIT +0.6% +0.6% 2026-08-17T02:00:16.646687+00:00 source post → · verdict →

Relative = altcoins scored against BTC, BTC itself against USD — so BTC rows carry the same number in both columns. Absolute is always vs USD, and never carries a verdict.

Price-target record
Backtested records
Hit rate: 50% 6 hits · 6 misses · n=12

Settled after the fact from archived posts — the call was already on the record before we scored it, but we were not watching it live. Kept on a separate line and never merged into the prospective hit rate above.

Graded under price_target_v1 — did the stated price target print? A different rule, never merged into the directional rate above.

CoinCallResult SettledSource
BTC backtested MISS 2026-08-18 verdict →
BTC backtested MISS 2026-08-17 verdict →
LINK backtested HIT 2026-08-17 verdict →
ETH backtested HIT 2026-08-17 verdict →
BTC backtested < $113000 HIT 2026-07-31 verdict →
BTC backtested <= $113000 HIT 2026-07-31 verdict →
BTC backtested < $200000 HIT 2026-07-31 verdict →
BTC backtested >= $116000 MISS 2026-07-30 verdict →
BTC backtested >= $200000 MISS 2026-07-30 verdict →
BTC backtested > $63000 HIT 2026-07-28 verdict →
BTC backtested >= $80000 MISS 2026-07-28 verdict →
BTC backtested < $55000 MISS 2026-07-28 verdict →
Side by side with CoinVerdict
CoinVerdict win rate (settle_v1 vs BTC): 63%

Same ruler on both sides: kol_directional_v1 runs on identical parameters to settle_v1 — a 7-day window, a ±3% band, altcoins scored vs BTC and BTC vs USD. That is why the hit rate above and CoinVerdict's 63% can sit side by side. · How the two differ →

Embed this scorecard

Paste this into your site. The badge updates itself as new calls settle. · Share card (PNG for X)

Live preview — real data, the same script your site loads.

Inline pill · data-cv-style="pill"

Light card · data-cv-style="card"

Dark card · data-cv-style="dark"

Big number · data-cv-style="stat"

Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.

Source: VeraMind settled-call ledger · only verified settlements, never open calls. · Chatter, recaps and "watching" posts never enter the ledger — only explicit calls are settled and counted.