CoinVerdict
中文 Scoreboard

@100trillionUSD — settled call record

Hit rate · 0 hits · 0 misses · n=0 Archive building (n < 10) avg |move| of hits (absolute, vs USD)

Rate rule: kol_directional_v1 — read the full rule →

Small sample — the interval is wide and the number will move.

If you had followed

Follow the calls, or just hold BTC?

-$15following every call
+$10just holding BTC
-$24the difference

0 live · 4 backtested — never merged into one number.

These dollar figures are carried by backtests — hypothetical performance from applying the same rule to past statements, not a live track record. Live records: 0 / 4.

Each call is an independent $100 position, closed after 7 days — no compounding, no fees, no slippage. How this is scored →

Rating and benchmarks
Rating Sample building (4/20)

Rating rule: kol_rating_v1 — read the full rule →

Directional record
Backtested records
Hit rate: 0% 0 hits · 4 misses · n=4

No prospective calls settled yet — the rate above stays blank until the first one lands. Everything below is backtested.

Settled after the fact from archived posts — the call was already on the record before we scored it, but we were not watching it live. Kept on a separate line and never merged into the prospective hit rate above.

CoinCallWhat they said Relative (ranked) Absolute (vs USD) SettledSource
ETH backtested ↓ Bearish No ETH bull market pump in 2023/2024, like it did in 2017 and 2021... MISS -1.7% +2.1% 2026-08-17T09:00:09.243536+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish bitcoin ... is in bear now MISS +5.9% +5.9% 2026-08-17T09:00:08.367541+00:00 source post → · verdict →
ETH backtested ↓ Bearish Take ETH for example: -70% from its 2021 top and almost back to its 2017 top MISS +1.2% +7.1% 2026-08-17T09:00:07.037151+00:00 source post → · verdict →
BTC backtested ↓ Bearish IMO data is telling us that we have not seen bottom formation yet, and that there is a >50% probablility that we go lower (below 200wma $61k or realized price $53k). MISS -0.4% -0.4% 2026-08-17T08:30:08.989969+00:00 source post → · verdict →

Relative = altcoins scored against BTC, BTC itself against USD — so BTC rows carry the same number in both columns. Absolute is always vs USD, and never carries a verdict.

Price-target record
Backtested records
Hit rate: 0% 0 hits · 2 misses · n=2

Settled after the fact from archived posts — the call was already on the record before we scored it, but we were not watching it live. Kept on a separate line and never merged into the prospective hit rate above.

Graded under price_target_v1 — did the stated price target print? A different rule, never merged into the directional rate above.

CoinCallResult SettledSource
BTC backtested MISS 2026-08-17 verdict →
ETH backtested MISS 2026-08-17 verdict →
Side by side with CoinVerdict
CoinVerdict win rate (settle_v1 vs BTC): 63%

Same ruler on both sides: kol_directional_v1 runs on identical parameters to settle_v1 — a 7-day window, a ±3% band, altcoins scored vs BTC and BTC vs USD. That is why the hit rate above and CoinVerdict's 63% can sit side by side. · How the two differ →

Embed this scorecard

Paste this into your site. The badge updates itself as new calls settle. · Share card (PNG for X)

Live preview — real data, the same script your site loads.

Inline pill · data-cv-style="pill"

Light card · data-cv-style="card"

Dark card · data-cv-style="dark"

Big number · data-cv-style="stat"

Media and creators may cite CoinVerdict data with attribution and a link back.

Source: VeraMind settled-call ledger · only verified settlements, never open calls. · Chatter, recaps and "watching" posts never enter the ledger — only explicit calls are settled and counted.