WIF / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
WIF sits at $0.1533 with RSI 43.6 and a 27.0% discount to its 200-day average
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-23 00:39 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Longs pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-27 — Underweight — -5.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-26 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-25 — Underweight — -4.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -1.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Overweight — -0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-22 — Overweight — — — VOID
2026-08-21 — Overweight — +13.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Overweight — +27.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-19 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-16 — Underweight — +19.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — +4.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-11 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — +3.0% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +1.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +1.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — -8.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — -4.5% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -4.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -5.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Underweight — -8.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -9.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — +0.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — -0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +0.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +1.4% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — -6.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -0.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Underweight — -2.8% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.1999, especially with RSI(14) above 50, overturns the bearish ruling.. Cautious read: a break below $0.1368 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your MACD spark is fighting a chart that still trades below every major average you cited.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your MACD spark is fighting a chart that still trades below every major average you cited. Key support to defend sits near $0.1368. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I’ll concede the ugliest number, Mara: WIF is 27.0% below SMA200 and the 50/200-day structure sits at -23.8%. But the market has already carved out a 60-day low at $0.1368, MACD is expanding at +0.0001499, and the coin is up 1.4% over seven days; that’s a floor trying to form, not fresh collapse.
Leo, your MACD spark is fighting a chart that still trades below every major average you cited. WIF is 2.5% under SMA20, 4.3% under SMA50, and remains 23.4% beneath the $0.1999 60-day high; calling a 1.4% weekly bounce a floor is hopium wearing a tiny mustache.
· MACD histogram expansion at +0.0001499
· Fear&Greed at 31 enabling a contrarian rebound
· Recovery above $0.1535 triggering momentum buying
Invalidation: A sustained move above $0.1999, especially with RSI(14) above 50, overturns the bearish ruling.
Mara, Fear&Greed at 31 is already fearful, and the $0.1368 low gives buyers a defined line in the sand. When the crowd is this cold, upside can arrive before the averages turn.
Leo, fear without capitulation is just weak demand. Taker buy/sell is 0.99 and long accounts are 50.4%, so the crowd isn't dumping or buying with conviction.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, Fear&Greed at 31 is already fearful, and the $0.1368 low gives buyers a defined line in the sand. When the crowd is this cold, upside can arrive before the averages turn.
Leo, fear without capitulation is just weak demand. Taker buy/sell is 0.99 and long accounts are 50.4%, so the crowd isn't dumping or buying with conviction.
I’m with Mara on the positioning exhibit: an L/S ratio of 1.02 and taker flow at 0.99 show balance, not a squeeze setup. There is no funding-rate data here to manufacture a bullish carry signal.
Leo, a 27.0% gap below SMA200 is a liquidity-regime scar, not a macro rescue plan. Until price reclaims $0.1535 and then attacks the $0.1999 high, every bounce is negotiating from below.
I pick the bear side, with the decisive exhibit being WIF’s 27.0% discount to SMA200 alongside the -23.8% SMA50/SMA200 structure. I invalidate this ruling on a sustained break above $0.1999, or sooner if RSI(14) reclaims 50 while price holds above $0.1535.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
Bearish. Kai Nakamura: WIF trades 2.5% below SMA20, 4.3% below SMA50, and 27.0% below SMA200; the 50/200-day spread is -23.8%, a deeply bearish structure. MACD histogram is expanding at +0.0001499, but that is a small countertrend spark beneath heavy overhead resistance. Evidence families: moving-average structure, RSI/MACD, multi-horizon price change, support/resistance. Conflicts: expanding MACD histogram and 7-day gain of 1.4% versus bearish averages and a 30-day loss of 2.5%. Sufficiency: adequate.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
Bearish. Sofia Reyes: Fear&Greed at 31 shows a fearful crowd, while positioning is nearly flat at 50.4% long accounts, L/S ratio 1.02, and taker buy/sell 0.99. That is not capitulation; it is a hesitant market with no aggressive buying pressure to challenge the downtrend. Evidence families: Fear&Greed, account positioning, taker flow. Conflicts: fear can become fuel for a rebound, and long/short balance is not outright crowded. Sufficiency: adequate.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
Neutral-to-bearish. Ed Walsh: the pack contains market-data listings and headlines saying the Crypto Clarity Act still faces debate over ethics and other provisions. Those headlines provide no WIF-specific catalyst, so the tape is left to fight its own weak trend.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Bearish by default for this horizon. Priya Anand: the data pack provides no token-economics, valuation, supply, or adoption metrics for WIF. With fundamentals unavailable and price 23.4% below the 60-day high, there is no fundamental exhibit strong enough to offset the chart damage.
fe87025241f2ea0f76180dd2c223546c9c7fd24c6b992021dab81e68cabe7cc78624d818ee7811d0e765aa63f60423eb1e28fec5823b0c3f5024085df84084a2Committed 2026-07-24T10:21:07+00:00 · 100 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-09-05 · 2026-09-01 · 2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-26 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23