CoinVerdict
中文 Scoreboard

TIA / The Verdict

generated 2026-07-31 00:53 UTC
$0.33
+1.68% · 24h
price as of 2026-07-31 00:53 UTC
Price source
📜 Archived verdict of 2026-07-31 — latest verdict → TIA
The Verdict
Underweight

TIA’s 37.8 RSI offers a bounce setup, but price remains 11.3% below its 200-day average

⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-31 00:53 UTC

Technicalsignal strength Bearish C
Measures how strong the directional signal from price structure is. An analyst lists independent evidence families (trend, momentum, structure) from the data pack; code converts the count to a letter — 3+ families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicting evidence caps the grade at C; insufficient information gets no grade at all. The letter is signal strength — direction is shown separately. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Sentimentsignal strength Bearish C
Same scale as Technical, applied to crowd evidence — fear/greed, positioning, and flow. 3+ independent evidence families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicts cap at C; not enough information, no grade. The letter says how loud the crowd signal is, not which way price will go. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction Longs pay A
Measures perpetual funding-rate pressure — risk, not direction. The smaller the 8-hour normalized rate, the calmer the market: under 0.5 bp = A+, then A, B, C, D as pressure grows, F beyond 10 bp (extreme crowding). Who pays (longs or shorts) is shown separately. Read A+ as “calm”, never as “bullish”. (funding_rule_v1) full scales →
KOL Consensussettled-record quality Archive building
Measures the quality and strength of on-record KOL consensus. Only authors with 20+ settled calls count. The majority share sets the base letter (85%+ = A+ down to 55%+ = D), but few qualified authors cap it — under 5 authors we show the direction and withhold the grade while the record builds. (kol_rule_v1) full scales →

Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.

Track record
7W–0L–0P · 1 neutral · since 2026-07-15
95% CI 64.6–100.0% · n=7 · early sample
2026-07-31 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-07
2026-07-30 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-06
2026-07-29 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-05
2026-07-28 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-04
2026-07-27 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-03
2026-07-26 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-02
2026-07-25 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-01
2026-07-24 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-07-31
2026-07-23 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-23 · TIA price $0.3639 · BTC $66209
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-30 · TIA price $0.3224 · BTC $64044.7
vs BTC
-8.4% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-22 — Underweight — -6.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-22 · TIA price $0.3609 · BTC $65937.6
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-29 · TIA price $0.3297 · BTC $64051
vs BTC
-6.0% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-21 — Underweight — -6.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-21 · TIA price $0.3598 · BTC $65161.4
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-28 · TIA price $0.3281 · BTC $63644.6
vs BTC
-6.6% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-20 — Underweight — -4.7% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-20 · TIA price $0.3586 · BTC $63745.4
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-27 · TIA price $0.3495 · BTC $65216
vs BTC
-4.7% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-19 — Underweight — -5.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-19 · TIA price $0.3593 · BTC $64708.7
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-26 · TIA price $0.3397 · BTC $64416
vs BTC
-5.0% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-17 — Underweight — -13.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-17 · TIA price $0.3959 · BTC $63739.1
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-24 · TIA price $0.3484 · BTC $64928
vs BTC
-13.6% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-16 — Underweight — -14.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-16 · TIA price $0.417 · BTC $64777.8
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-23 · TIA price $0.3639 · BTC $66209
vs BTC
-14.6% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

stance change · Neutral → Underweight
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -12.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-15 · TIA price $0.4099 · BTC $65000.1
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-22 · TIA price $0.3674 · BTC $66588
vs BTC
-12.5% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →

The evidence
Bull evidence
Bear evidence ✓ aligns with this verdict
Market state

coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read

Price
Price at verdict$0.3277 +1.7% 24h
60d high0.4287 -23.6%
60d low0.2768 +18.3%
RSI(14)37.8
vs 200d SMA -11.3%
30d change -8.2%
Funding (net) +0.53 bp/8h
Fear & Greed25 · Extreme Fear
Long accounts43.1% long

snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges

Read this ruling three ways

Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.

The Deliberation
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
VS
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
⚔ Key clashes
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
TO
Positioning Desk (Theo Okafor)
DV
Macro Desk (Dmitri Volkov)
JA
Risk Committee · Final Ruling
Chief Adjudicator (Aldrich)
DirectionBearish
ConfidenceMedium
HorizonWeeks (swing)
Key support$0.2768
Key resistance$0.3284
InvalidationA decisive close above 0.3284 accompanied by RSI(14) above 50 invalidates the bearish ruling.
Main risksRSI-driven relief rallyExtreme Fear reversalSMA50/SMA200 bullish structure
KOL Settlement Seat
Calls on record: 0 up · 0 down

Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind

Analyst notes
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)

The tape is below SMA20 by 9.2%, SMA50 by 11.8%, and SMA200 by 11.3%, with RSI(14) at 37.8. The contracting MACD histogram at -0.00407 and 7-day loss of 3.5% keep pressure bearish, even as SMA50 sits 0.5% above SMA200 and price is only 18.3% above the 60-day low.

Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)

Extreme Fear at 25 is fertile ground for a reflex rally, but the crowd is not fully washed out: long accounts still make up 43.1%, the L/S ratio is 0.76, and taker buy/sell is 0.96. That combination says defensive positioning, not capitulation with aggressive buying.

Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)

The headline mix is mostly noise: one report explicitly attributes TIA’s move to market noise rather than a catalyst, while the RPC-provider guide is practical infrastructure coverage. Broader risk appetite is bruised by Strategy’s $8.2 billion Q2 loss and Coinbase’s 5% drop after missed revenue estimates; the bullish narrative pieces provide no concrete catalyst.

Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)

The pack supplies no token-supply, unlock, usage, revenue, or valuation figures, so a durable fundamental rerating cannot be established. The modular narrative is mentioned in bullish coverage, but narrative alone does not offset a market price sitting 23.6% below the 60-day high.

Provenance
Report fingerprint
7106f1ff067b5c099a718a1ff03117a8044508a0bfadfad8aafd2f628cc80cb3
UTC date
2026-07-31

Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain

SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.

Recent verdicts
Related verdicts