CoinVerdict
中文 Scoreboard

LIT / The Verdict

generated 2026-07-31 01:54 UTC
$2.27
+3.06% · 24h
price as of 2026-07-31 01:54 UTC
Price source
📜 Archived verdict of 2026-07-31 — latest verdict → LIT
The Verdict
Overweight

A 2.2729 price with RSI 53.1 sits above every major moving average as LIT presses higher

⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-07-31 01:54 UTC

Technicalsignal strength Bullish C
Measures how strong the directional signal from price structure is. An analyst lists independent evidence families (trend, momentum, structure) from the data pack; code converts the count to a letter — 3+ families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicting evidence caps the grade at C; insufficient information gets no grade at all. The letter is signal strength — direction is shown separately. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Sentimentsignal strength Mixed C
Same scale as Technical, applied to crowd evidence — fear/greed, positioning, and flow. 3+ independent evidence families with no conflict = A+, 2 = B, 1 = D; conflicts cap at C; not enough information, no grade. The letter says how loud the crowd signal is, not which way price will go. (evidence_rule_v1) full scales →
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction Longs pay A
Measures perpetual funding-rate pressure — risk, not direction. The smaller the 8-hour normalized rate, the calmer the market: under 0.5 bp = A+, then A, B, C, D as pressure grows, F beyond 10 bp (extreme crowding). Who pays (longs or shorts) is shown separately. Read A+ as “calm”, never as “bullish”. (funding_rule_v1) full scales →
KOL Consensussettled-record quality Archive building
Measures the quality and strength of on-record KOL consensus. Only authors with 20+ settled calls count. The majority share sets the base letter (85%+ = A+ down to 55%+ = D), but few qualified authors cap it — under 5 authors we show the direction and withhold the grade while the record builds. (kol_rule_v1) full scales →

Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.

Track record
0W–1L–0P · 2 neutral · since 2026-07-22
95% CI 0.0–79.3% · n=1 · early sample
2026-07-31 — Overweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-07
2026-07-30 — Overweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-06
2026-07-29 — Overweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-05
stance change · Underweight → Overweight
2026-07-28 — Underweight · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-04
stance change · Neutral → Underweight
2026-07-27 — Neutral · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-03
2026-07-26 — Neutral · Settling — verdict due 2026-08-02
stance change · Underweight → Neutral
2026-07-24 — Underweight — +6.3% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-24 · LIT price $2.1441 · BTC $64928
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-31 · LIT price $2.2729 · BTC $64779.5
vs BTC
+6.3% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

stance change · Neutral → Underweight
2026-07-23 — Neutral — +0.9% — flat ✓ Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-23 · LIT price $2.299 · BTC $66209
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-30 · LIT price $2.2442 · BTC $64044.7
vs BTC
+0.9% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

2026-07-22 — Neutral — +4.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Entry (T0)
2026-07-22 · LIT price $2.2684 · BTC $65937.6
Settled (T+7d)
2026-07-29 · LIT price $2.3108 · BTC $64051
vs BTC
+4.9% · Rule settle_v1

Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.

graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →

The evidence
Bull evidence ✓ aligns with this verdict
Bear evidence
Market state

coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read

Price
Price at verdict$2.27 +3.1% 24h
60d high2.77 -17.8%
60d low1.28 +78.3%
RSI(14)53.1
vs 200d SMA +55.3%
30d change +9.8%
Funding (net) +0.86 bp/8h
Fear & Greed25 · Extreme Fear
Long accounts66.3% long

snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges

Read this ruling three ways

Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.

The Deliberation
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
VS
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
⚔ Key clashes
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
LV
Bull Research (Leo Vance)
MF
Bear Research (Mara Frost)
TO
Positioning Desk (Theo Okafor)
DV
Macro Desk (Dmitri Volkov)
JA
Risk Committee · Final Ruling
Chief Adjudicator (Aldrich)
DirectionBullish
ConfidenceMedium
HorizonWeeks (swing)
Key support$2.27
Key resistance$2.30
InvalidationA decisive close below 2.2705, accompanied by RSI below 50, overturns the bullish swing call.
Main riskscrowded 66.3% long positioningweak crypto macro tapeMACD histogram remains negative
KOL Settlement Seat
Calls on record: 0 up · 0 down

Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind

Analyst notes
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)

Kai Nakamura: Bullish. Price is 0.2% above SMA20, 10.4% above SMA50, and 55.3% above SMA200; SMA50 leads SMA200 by 40.7%. RSI 53.1 is constructive, while the contracting MACD histogram at -0.01715 is the main short-term conflict.

Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)

Sofia Reyes: Mixed, leaning bearish on positioning. Fear&Greed is 25, or Extreme Fear, yet 66.3% of accounts are long with a 1.96 long/short ratio and taker buy/sell at 1.00. That is fearful sentiment sitting on crowded longs, not clean capitulation.

Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)

Ed Walsh: The LIT-specific headlines are supportive, centered on buyback-and-burn speculation and Ethereum infrastructure backing. The broader tape is hostile: Strategy booked an $8.2 billion Q2 loss and Coinbase fell 5% after missing revenue estimates.

Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)

Priya Anand: The data pack offers no token-supply, revenue, valuation, or protocol-usage figures. Buyback and burn headlines may support the narrative, but they cannot establish fundamental value from this evidence alone.

Provenance
Report fingerprint
a1625124a18f69a8a9ff812e9bc5872579a447da634d257562fc2a29cdf21b60
UTC date
2026-07-31

Not yet committed. Today's rulings are hashed into the chain after the daily run — until then this report has a fingerprint but no chain entry. · Check the chain

SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.

Recent verdicts
Related verdicts