APT / The Verdict
Display tier = stance × judge confidence. Settlement is always three-way.
APT’s 0.5633 price sits 30.3% below its SMA200 as bearish structure tightens
⚖ Verdict rendered 2026-08-26 00:36 UTC
Technicalsignal strength
Bearish
C
Sentimentsignal strength
Bearish
C
Fundingrate pressure — grade is risk, not direction
Shorts pay
A
KOL Consensussettled-record quality
—
Archive building
Each grade is scored on its own scale — they are not averaged, by design.
2026-08-24 — Underweight — -17.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-23 — Underweight — -16.0% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-21 — Underweight — -8.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-20 — Underweight — -11.1% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-16 — Underweight — -3.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-15 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-14 — Underweight — -10.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-13 — Underweight — -8.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-12 — Underweight — -10.6% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-11 — Underweight — -12.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-10 — Underweight — — — VOID
2026-08-09 — Neutral — -8.9% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-08 — Underweight — -3.2% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-07 — Underweight — -4.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-06 — Underweight — -3.8% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-05 — Underweight — +0.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-04 — Underweight — +2.1% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-03 — Underweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-02 — Underweight — +6.6% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-08-01 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-31 — Underweight — +2.9% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-30 — Underweight — +4.4% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-29 — Underweight — -1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-28 — Underweight — -3.0% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-27 — Neutral — -8.4% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-26 — Underweight — -7.3% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-25 — Underweight — -5.4% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-24 — Underweight — -7.9% — WIN Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-23 — Neutral — -6.5% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-22 — Underweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-21 — Underweight — +0.3% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-20 — Underweight — +5.5% — LOSS Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-19 — Underweight — +1.6% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-17 — Underweight — +0.2% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-16 — Underweight — -1.7% — PUSH Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-15 — Neutral — -3.7% — flat ✗ Verify this settlement
Prices from the archived reports themselves — open either end to check.
2026-07-14 — Neutral — — — VOID
graded settle_v1, 7d vs BTC — misses stay on the record · full receipts →
coin_evidence_v1 · how these are read
snapshot at verdict time, computed from exchange data — facts, not opinions · price = median of 5 exchanges
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a sustained move above 0.6000 with RSI above 50.. Cautious read: a break below $0.5139 voids this research. Confidence High — when unsure, stand aside. Bears' core: Leo, your “washed-out” label collides with Fear&Greed at 65 and 59.
Balanced read: the ruling below stands as the base case. Direction Bearish, horizon Weeks (swing).
Bold case: Leo, your “washed-out” label collides with Fear&Greed at 65 and 59. Key support to defend sits near $0.5139. Horizon: Weeks (swing).
Three risk framings of the same research — every number from today's archived data.
I concede the ugly number: APT is 30.3% below SMA200 and the 24-hour move is -6.54%. But that damage is already visible in the chart, while the 60-day low at 0.5139 is still 9.5% below spot and network throughput has reportedly hit a record; a washed-out laggard can turn sharply when the broad rally returns.
Leo, your “washed-out” label collides with Fear&Greed at 65 and 59.0% long accounts, not exhaustion. The key number is the 0.79 taker buy/sell ratio: buyers are already crowded by account count, yet aggressive flow still leans to sellers, while APT remains 4.6% below SMA50 and 30.3% below SMA200.
I think the bearish ruling leaves upside underpriced: the 60-day low is 0.5139, only 9.5% below spot, while reported record throughput and a +0.1% 7-day return show stabilization. The settled record also supports the direction, with 5 WIN and 0 LOSS among shown directional calls.
The fastest failure is a rebound from 0.5139 that invalidates the trend call; the most fragile exhibit is the single-session 0.79 taker buy/sell ratio. A broad crypto rally already produced a cited 7.19% APT surge, proving this laggard can gap upward.
I think Leo overreaches on throughput and Dmitri overreaches on extrapolating one flow ratio; the structural trend still favors Mara. The deciding condition is whether price reclaims 0.6000 with RSI above 50.
· sharp broad-market rally
· record-throughput narrative converting into demand
· rebound from 0.5139 support
Invalidation: The bearish ruling is overturned by a sustained move above 0.6000 with RSI above 50.
Mara, 0.79 is a snapshot, not a verdict; the MACD histogram is still positive at +0.003155, and the 7-day return is +0.1% despite the longer drawdown.
Leo, that histogram is contracting, and +0.1% over 7 days is stagnation beside a -5.0% 30-day return. Price has not reclaimed even SMA20, sitting 2.2% below it.
▶ Live Debate · full exchange(4)
Mara, 0.79 is a snapshot, not a verdict; the MACD histogram is still positive at +0.003155, and the 7-day return is +0.1% despite the longer drawdown.
Leo, that histogram is contracting, and +0.1% over 7 days is stagnation beside a -5.0% 30-day return. Price has not reclaimed even SMA20, sitting 2.2% below it.
Leo, the crowd math favors Mara: 59.0% long accounts and a 1.44 L/S ratio meet a 0.79 taker ratio. Without funding data, I won’t invent a squeeze catalyst.
The macro tape offers no APT-specific liquidity impulse; blockchain-bank headlines do not repair a 26.9% SMA50-versus-SMA200 deficit. The 60-day high at 0.715 is 21.3% away, a heavy overhead supply zone.
I rule bearish: APT is underweight. The decisive exhibit is the combination of 0.5633 spot, 30.3% below SMA200, and selling-led taker flow at 0.79; the call is invalidated by a sustained reclaim of 0.6000 accompanied by RSI above 50.
Opinions are AI; settlements are facts. · data powered by VeraMind
Technical Analyst (Kai Nakamura)
I see a bearish trend: APT is 2.2% below SMA20, 4.6% below SMA50, and 30.3% below SMA200; SMA50 trails SMA200 by 26.9%. RSI at 45.7 is not capitulation, while the contracting +0.003155 MACD histogram offers only a fading countertrend spark.
Sentiment Analyst (Sofia Reyes)
I read a bearish crowd setup: Fear&Greed is 65, 59.0% of long accounts dominate with an L/S ratio of 1.44, yet taker buy/sell is only 0.79. The zero-message StockTwits sample is unusable, and funding is not provided.
Macro & News Analyst (Ed Walsh)
The headline tape is promotional but not price-confirming: network throughput reportedly hit a record while APT lagged, and one rally headline cited a 7.19% surge during a broad crypto rally. Broader blockchain-bank initiatives are sector context, not a demonstrated APT catalyst.
Fundamental Analyst (Priya Anand)
Record network throughput is the strongest fundamental datapoint, but the pack supplies no revenue, valuation, token-unlock, or adoption figures to translate throughput into token demand. The cycle-outperformance headlines therefore cannot outweigh APT’s 30-day decline of 5.0%.
2091ef1ec8aa0a7bcd8ad194a9efa3f7738811aaac401bc3d416a3d9fc39c20f650479c8d662b50f512b6a5ccfb1242fb411c562a0dabecc0eed582b87132f9fCommitted 2026-08-27T00:20:00+00:00 · 93 rulings that day · Check the chain
SHA-256 of this report as stored. It is the exact value committed to that day's chain — recompute it yourself and compare.
2026-08-31 · 2026-08-30 · 2026-08-29 · 2026-08-28 · 2026-08-27 · 2026-08-25 · 2026-08-24 · 2026-08-23